Delayed effects of cigarette graphic warning labels on smoking behavior

Zhenhao Shi,An-Li Wang,Jiaying Liu,Janet Audrain-McGovern,Kevin G. Lynch,James Loughead,Daniel D. Langleben
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.06.24300835
2024-09-26
Abstract:Introduction: Graphic warning labels (GWLs) are widely employed to communicate smoking-related health risks; however, their implementation in the US has been held back by concerns about their efficacy. Most GWLs elicit a high level of emotional reaction (ER). The extent to which ER contributes to GWLs efficacy in improving smoking outcomes is a subject of debate. Our recent study showed poorer efficacy of the high-ER GWLs versus the low-ER ones during a month-long naturalistic exposure. Whether GWL effects persist after discontinuing the exposure remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis to investigate the delayed effects of GWLs on smoking severity in adult smokers. The number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) was measured immediately as well as 4 weeks after the end of a month-long exposure to high-ER versus low-ER GWLs. Participants indicated their subjective feeling of being relieved from having to see the GWLs. Results: We found a significant reduction in CPD from the immediate to the 4-week post-exposure timepoint. There was no difference in CPD reduction between the high-ER and low-ER groups. Subjective sense of relief from GWL exposure was associated with greater CPD reduction in the high-ER group, but not the low-ER group. Conclusions: Our study suggests lasting impact of GWLs on smoking behavior. The findings may be particularly important to high-arousal GWLs, which appear less effective in reducing smoking during active exposure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?