A DEVICE AND METHOD FOR THE ATRAUMATIC TRANSPORTATION OF THE INJURED PATIENT.

H. Root,R. A. Vantyn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5555/URI:PII:0039606065901315

IF: 4.348

1965-08-01

Surgery

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Adenosine and its receptor agonists regulate nitric oxide production and RAW 264.7 macrophages via both receptor binding and its downstream metabolites-inosine.

H. Min,S. Moochhala,K. Eng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(00)00502-6

2000-03-31

Life Science

Abstract:
Contingent Effects of E-Cigarette Warning Label Messages on Cognitive Elaboration and Fear Among U.S. Youth Ages 14–17 by Vaping Experience and Peer Vaping Behavior

Kwanho Kim,Jeff Niederdeppe,Motasem Kalaji,Leah Scolere,Norman Porticella,Alan Mathios,Rosemary Avery,Michael Dorf,Amelia Greiner Safi,Sahara Byrne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2394260

IF: 3.501

2024-08-30

Health Communication

Abstract:The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) currently requires a warning about the addictive nature of nicotine to be placed on electronic cigarette advertisements and packaging. To consider the value of additional warning messages on public health outcomes, this study examines the additive effect of new warnings that are based on recent claims from U.S. federal authorities. We conducted a secondary analysis of recent data from 1,202 U.S. youth ages 14–17 to test the impact of exposure to additional warnings placed on advertisements for vaping products on cognitive elaboration, fear, and willingness to vape and smoke. This investigation also looked closely at effects on youth who may have increased risk of future vaping due to prior vaping experiences or having friends who vape. Exposure to the alternative warnings did not amplify cognitive elaboration compared to the current FDA warning alone, but it did increase fear. Youth elaboration on both the benefits and risks of vaping was associated with willingness to both vape and smoke, but fear was not associated with either outcome. The effects of warning label exposure and cognitive elaboration varied by prior vaping experience and having at least one friend who vapes. We conclude by discussing the implications of this contingent pattern of effect and association.

health policy & services,communication
US adolescents' response to nicotine warning labels in influencer e-cigarette marketing social media posts: a survey-based randomised between-subject experiment

Julia Vassey,Erin A Vogel,Jennifer B Unger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2023-058534

2024-05-17

Abstract:Background: E-cigarette promotional posts with misleading nicotine warning labels on social media may lower adolescents' risk perceptions of e-cigarettes. A between-subject experiment assessed effects of influencers' e-cigarette promotional posts with different nicotine warning labels on adolescents' e-cigarette harm perceptions, susceptibility to e-cigarette use and perceptions of influencer credibility. Methods: In 2022, adolescents (N=1864, Mage=17 (SD=0.6)) were randomised to view six images and videos featuring influencers promoting e-cigarettes in one of five experimental conditions: two conditions with a 'tobacco-free nicotine' warning label (placed on an e-cigarette in the post or at the top of the post), two conditions with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) nicotine warning label (on an e-cigarette in the post or at the top of the post (control)) and one no-label condition. Participants rated influencers' credibility (eg, honesty). Harm perceptions of, and susceptibility to use, e-cigarettes were then assessed. Results: Participants who viewed posts with the FDA warning label at the top of the post perceived influencers as more honest, trustworthy and informed than in all the other conditions. E-cigarette never-users who viewed posts with a 'tobacco-free nicotine' warning label pictured on an e-cigarette (compared with the FDA label at the top of a post) were more likely to report susceptibility to e-cigarette use (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.73). Conclusions: Alterations of the required nicotine warning labels can make them less effective in deterring e-cigarette use behaviour. Tobacco control authorities could increase enforcement of the FDA-required nicotine warning labels and harness influencers for antitobacco messaging.
Effects of reduced nicotine content cigarette advertising with warning labels and social media features on product perceptions among young adults

Andrea C Johnson,Melissa Mercincavage,Andy S L Tan,Andrea C Villanti,Cristine D Delnevo,Andrew A Strasser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-023-00441-7

Abstract:This study sought to understand reactions to very low nicotine (VLN) cigarette advertising compared with conventional cigarette advertising with consideration of warning labels and social media context. The online experimental study recruited young adult cigarette smokers and nonsmokers (N = 1,608). Participants completed a discrete choice task with a 2 × 2 × 3 mixed design: brand, (VLN, Marlboro), context (Ad only, Ad on social media), and warning (Text-only, Well-known risk pictorial, or Lesser-known risk pictorial). Participants made choices about attention, appeal, harm, buying, and quitting intentions. Social media context increased attention and appeal. A well-known risk pictorial warning outperformed a text-only warning. Smokers had increased odds of quit intentions for VLN ads, yet nonsmokers had increased intentions to buy cigarettes on social media with a text-only warning. Results indicate differences in how young adults react to cigarette ads on social media, especially with the warnings they portray.
Impact of Financial Disclosures and Health Warnings on Youth and Young Adult Perceptions of Pro-E-cigarette Instagram Posts

Donghee N Lee,Meagan A Bluestein,Elise M Stevens,Alayna P Tackett,Ashley J Mathews,Emily T Hébert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntad219

2024-02-01

Abstract:Abstract Introduction We examined the impact of financial disclosures and warning labels on pro-e-cigarette Instagram posts and their association with attitudes toward the ad and product among youth and young adults. Methods During March to May 2021, we conducted a factorial experiment using an online convenience sample of youth and young adults (N = 1687, Mage = 21.54). Participants were randomized to one of four conditions: pro-e-cigarette Instagram posts with only a financial disclosure, only a warning label, both a financial disclosure + warning label, or no financial disclosure or warning label. After viewing the posts, participants answered questions regarding their attitude toward the ad and the product. We used one-way ANOVA to estimate the association of condition on outcomes controlling for demographics. Results Young adults who viewed Instagram posts with only a financial disclosure reported more positive attitudes toward the ad than those who viewed posts with both a financial disclosure + warning label (p < .05). Young adults who viewed posts with only a financial disclosure reported more positive attitudes toward the product than those who viewed posts with only a warning label, both a financial disclosure + warning label, and without either (ps < .05). Differences were not statistically significant for youth. E-cigarette use status was associated with increased positive attitudes toward the ad (p < .001) and product (p < .001) for all participants. Conclusions Our results can inform policy interventions to mitigate the effects of e-cigarette social media marketing among youth and young adults. Including financial disclosures may not decrease appeal of e-cigarettes compared to posts without either. Implications Findings from the study suggest that a warning label may be more effective in reducing the effects of pro-e-cigarette social media posts than a financial disclosure among young adults. Public health officials should examine additional strategies beyond financial disclosures and warning labels (eg, social media peer mentoring program) to offset the persuasive effects of pro-e-cigarette social media marketing posts on young people. Additional policy interventional efforts are needed to limit the impact of e-cigarette social media marketing.

public, environmental & occupational health,substance abuse
Noticing Voluntary E-Cigarette Warning Labels and Associations With Harm Perceptions and Use Intentions: A Baseline Cross-Sectional Analysis of Wave 4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Prior to the Food and Drug Administration Mandate

Christina N. Wysota,Zongshuan Duan,Yan Wang,Raymond S. Niaura,Lorien C. Abroms

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241249144

2024-05-07

American Journal of Health Promotion

Abstract:American Journal of Health Promotion, Ahead of Print. PurposeTo examine the effect of e-cigarette warning labels (EWLs) prior to the August 2018 FDA-warning label mandate to establish a baseline for future research.DesignCross-sectional survey.SettingUnited States.ParticipantsA cohort of adult participants in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study (n = 30,004) at Wave 4 (Dec 2016-Jan 2018).MeasuresCorrelates (e.g., sociodemographics, substance use, social influence, cigarette warnings, and mental health) of noticing EWLs in the past 30-days (noticed vs did not notice), perceived harm of e-cigarettes/nicotine (from 1 = not at all harmful to 5 = extremely harmful), relative harm of e-cigarettes (from 1 = less harmful to 3 = more harmful than cigarettes), intention to quit (yes/no) and intention to try e-cigarettes (from 1 = definitely not to 4 = definitely yes).ResultsThe prevalence of noticing EWLs was 22.1%. Those who currently use electronic nicotine products, established and experimentally, were more likely to notice EWLs relative to never users (aOR = 3.55; 95% CI: 2.96-4.25; P < .001 and aOR = 2.42; 95% CI: 1.88-3.10; P < .001, respectively). Those with past 30-day alcohol and cigarette use were less likely to notice EWLs (aOR = .27; 95% CI: .24-.31 and aOR = .91; 95% CI: .83-.99; respectively). Those who noticed cigarette warnings were more likely to notice EWLs (aOR = 12.00; 95% CI: 10.46-13.77; P < .001). Among those who noticed EWLs, there were higher odds of perceiving e-cigarettes to be equally or more harmful than cigarettes (aOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.30), but no association was found between noticing EWLs and perceived harm of e-cigarettes/nicotine or use intentions.ConclusionNoticing voluntary EWLs was not associated with increased perceived harm of e-cigarettes and nicotine harm, or e-cigarette use intentions. Future research is warranted to examine the effect of the FDA mandated EWLs.

public, environmental & occupational health
The Effect of Graphic Health Warning Labels Placed on the ENDS Device on Young Adult Users’ Experience, Exposure and Intention to Use: A Pilot Study

Wei Li,Mayra Vargas-Rivera,Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan,Ziyad Ben Taleb,Taghrid Asfar,Olatokunbo Osibogun,Seth M. Noar,Wasim Maziak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1872158

IF: 3.501

2021-01-21

Health Communication

Abstract:This proof-of-concept study aims to evaluate the effect of placing graphic health warning labels (GHWLs) on the ENDS device on users' experience, puffing patterns, harm perception, nicotine exposure, and intention to quit or use in the future. JUUL users (n = 26, age 18–24 years; 69% male; 85% Hispanic) were recruited to complete two 60 minutes ad libitum sessions that differed by GHWL on the device (GHWL vs. no-GHWL control) in an experimental clinical lab study. Compared to the control session, using JUUL with GHWL on the device was significantly associated with reduced positive experiences such as pleasure, product liking, and user satisfaction (p-value < 0.05 for all). Also, after exposure to GHWL, participants were less interested in using the same product again (p-value = 0.007), even if it was the only product available on the market compared to control (p-value = 0.03). Trends toward reduced puffing behavior and nicotine boost were also noted during the GHWL, compared to control sessions. This pilot study shows that placing GHWL on the ENDS device may be an effective and promising strategy to reduce ENDS use among young people.

health policy & services,communication
Effects of a nicotine warning label and vaping cessation resources on young adults’ perceptions of pro-vaping instagram influencer posts

Erin A Vogel,Jennifer B Unger,Julia Vassey,Jessica L Barrington-Trimis,Erin A. Vogel,Jennifer B. Unger,Jessica L. Barrington-Trimis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107888

IF: 4.4

2024-02-01

Addictive Behaviors

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Exposure to social media content promoting e-cigarette use ("vaping") is associated with subsequent tobacco use among young adults. Adding features to pro-vaping Instagram influencer posts, such as a nicotine warning label and vaping cessation resources, could help counteract posts' negative influence.METHODS: Young adults (N = 2,179; Mage = 22.6 [SD = 0.4]; 53.0 % cisgender women, 45.1 % Hispanic) completed an online experiment in 2021-2022 through an ongoing prospective cohort study. Participants viewed three simulated pro-vaping Instagram influencer posts in a four-group, between-subjects design. Post features differed by experimental condition: "label-only" (nicotine warning label on post), "link-only" (link to vaping cessation resources under post), "L&L" (label and link), or "control" (neither). Participants rated each influencer's traits (honest, trustworthy, informed, smart, attractive, popular; 0-100 %). After viewing all three posts, participants reported use intentions, susceptibility, positive and negative expectancies, and harm perceptions around the fictitious advertised vaping product. Past-month vapers additionally reported their desire and self-efficacy for quitting.RESULTS: L&L (versus control and link-only) participants viewed influencers as more honest, trustworthy, and informed. L&L (versus control) participants had lower odds of susceptibility to using the advertised product, lower positive expectancies, and greater negative expectancies. The label and link did not significantly affect participants' intentions to use the product, perceived harm of the product, or desire or self-efficacy for quitting vaping.CONCLUSIONS: Providing a nicotine warning label and link to vaping cessation resources on influencers' Instagram posts may have the unintended effect of increasing positive perceptions of the influencer. However, they may reduce susceptibility to product use.

substance abuse,psychology, clinical
Do Flavor Descriptions Influence Subjective Ratings of Flavored and Unflavored E-liquids Among Nonsmoking and Non-vaping UK Adolescents?

Maddy L Dyer,Steph F Suddell,Jasmine N Khouja,Michelle A Havill,Anna K M Blackwell,Olivia M Maynard,Marcus R Munafò,Angela S Attwood

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae054

2024-03-12

Abstract:Abstract Introduction Youth use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is rising globally and is associated with health harms. Flavor descriptions on e-liquid packaging may contribute to the appeal of e-cigarettes among youth. This study compared subjective ratings of e-liquid packaging flavor descriptions among nonsmoking and non-vaping UK adolescents. Aims and Methods This was an online observational study in a UK sample of nonsmoking and non-vaping adolescents aged 11–17 years. The primary analyses compared flavored versus unflavored descriptions and the secondary analyses compared sweet flavor versus fruit flavor descriptions. Outcomes were packaging appraisal, packaging receptivity, perceived harm, and perceived audience. Results The survey was completed by 120 participants (74% female). Packaging appraisal ratings were higher for e-liquids with flavored descriptions than unflavored descriptions (mean difference 5.9, 95% CI: 4.2 to 7.6, p < .001). Similarly, packaging receptivity ratings were higher for e-liquids with flavored descriptions than unflavored descriptions (mean difference 4.2, 95% CI: 2.8 to 5.6, p < .001). Participants also perceived e-liquids with flavored (vs. unflavored) descriptions as less “grown-up” (mean difference −5.2, 95% CI: −7.3 to −3.1, p < .001). However, ratings of perceived harm were similar for flavored and unflavored descriptions (mean difference −1.0, 95% CI: −2.6 to .5, p = .189). Conclusions Although this study found differences in subjective ratings of e-liquids with flavored and unflavored descriptions, nonsmoking and non-vaping UK adolescents generally had low appraisal and receptivity for e-liquids and they perceived them as being “grown-up” and harmful. Implications Youth use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is increasing globally, leading to concerns about health harms. This study compared adolescents’ ratings of e-liquids with flavored versus unflavored descriptions and e-liquids with sweet flavor versus fruit flavor descriptions. This study adds to previous studies that have compared adolescents’ ratings of e-liquids with tobacco flavor versus non-tobacco flavor descriptions. Although packaging appraisal and receptivity ratings were higher (more positive) for e-liquids with flavored versus unflavored descriptions, overall, adolescents who do not smoke or vape had low appraisal and receptivity for e-liquids, and they perceived them as being “grown-up” and harmful.

public, environmental & occupational health,substance abuse
Exploring the opinions and potential impact of unflavoured e-liquid on smoking cessation among people who smoke and smoking relapse among people who previously smoked and now use e-cigarettes: findings from a UK-based mixed methods study

Jasmine N Khouja,Maddy L Dyer,Michelle A Havill,Martin J Dockrell,Marcus R Munafò,Angela S Attwood

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01003-z

2024-05-03

Abstract:Background: Although electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) appear to be effective in helping people who smoke to stop smoking, concerns about use of e-cigarettes among young people have led to restrictions on non-tobacco flavoured e-liquids in some countries and some US states. These restrictions could reduce the appeal of these products to non-smoking youth but could have negative consequences for people who smoke or use e-cigarettes. Methods: In this mixed methods study, we recruited UK adults who smoked or used to smoke and subsequently vaped to explore their opinions of unflavoured e-liquids and their beliefs about how they would be impacted by hypothetical e-liquid flavour restrictions. Participants trialled an unflavoured e-liquid instead of their usual nicotine product for four hours and completed a survey and an online interview. Results: Using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis and graphically presented data, we found differences in participants' opinions of unflavoured e-liquid. If only unflavoured, tobacco flavoured, and menthol flavoured e-liquids remained on the UK market, some people who smoke or vape may be unaffected, but some may relapse to smoking or continue smoking. Despite most wanting to prevent young people from initiating vaping, participants had varying opinions on whether flavour restrictions would be an effective method. Conclusions: The findings highlight that people who smoke and vape could be impacted by flavour restrictions in a range of ways, some of which could have a potential adverse impact on harm reduction efforts in the UK (e.g., by making smoking more appealing than vaping).
Impact of product-based e-cigarette marketing on the attitudes and behavioural intentions of young Australians: an experimental study

Michelle I Jongenelis,Kahlia McCausland,Stefan Bode,Tess Howard,Melissa Ledger,Sarah J Durkin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058709

2024-06-11

Abstract:Background: The tobacco industry has a history of using language to downplay the harms associated with cigarettes and mislead consumers and policymakers. Emerging evidence suggests similar tactics are being used in the context of e-cigarettes; however, exploration of the impact of product name on attitudes towards e-cigarettes and susceptibility to use is lacking. This experimental study explored whether attitudes towards e-cigarettes and susceptibility to use are influenced by the names used by the industry to describe and market these products. Method: An accredited web panel provider recruited a sample of 383 Australians aged 12-29 years who had never smoked to participate in an online survey that featured an embedded experiment. Participants were randomly allocated to one of three conditions, each of which used a different name to describe e-cigarettes (condition 1: 'e-cigarettes', condition 2: 'vapes'; condition 3: either 'IGETS', 'Puff Bars', 'HQD Cuvies' or 'Gunnpods'). The survey assessed respondents' overall opinion of the product described; attitudes towards the product; liking of the product; and curiosity, willingness and intentions to use the product. Results: Those in the 'brand name' condition scored higher than those in the 'e-cigarettes' condition on all dependent variables. Those in the 'vapes' condition scored higher than those in the 'e-cigarettes' condition on product attitude. Conclusion: Findings indicate that the use of brand names and terms such as 'vapes' instead of 'e-cigarettes' results in more favourable attitudes towards e-cigarettes and susceptibility to use among young Australians. Results highlight the problematic influence of promotional language use favoured by industry.
The impact of flavour, device type and warning messages on youth preferences for electronic nicotine delivery systems: evidence from an online discrete choice experiment

Ce Shang,Jidong Huang,Frank J Chaloupka,Sherry L Emery

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053754

IF: 6.953

2017-11-02

Tobacco Control

Abstract:Objective To examine the impact of flavour, device type and health warning messages on youth preference for electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), and to provide evidence and data to inform the Food and Drug Administration’s potential regulatory actions on ENDS. Design An online discrete choice experiment was conducted in September 2015. Each participant was given nine choice sets and asked to choose one out of two alternative ENDS products, with varying characteristics in three attributes (flavour, device type and warning message). The impact of the attributes on the probability of choosing ENDS was analysed using conditional and nested logit regressions, controlling for individual sociodemographic characteristics and current smoking status. Setting and participants A general population sample of 515 participants (50 ever-users and 465 never-users of ENDS) aged 14–17 years were recruited to complete the experiment using an online panel. Results Fruit/sweets/beverage flavours significantly increase the probability of choosing ENDS among youth (p<0.01 for never-users and <0.1 for ever-users) and flavour has the most pronounced impact among three attributes. Among never-users, menthol flavour also increases (p<0.05) the probability of choosing ENDS compared with tobacco flavour. Vaping devices that are modifiable, compared with cigarette-like e-cigarettes, increase (p<0.05) the probability of choosing ENDS among adolescent never-users. Warning messages reduce (p<0.01) the probability of choosing ENDS among never-users. Conclusions and relevance Restricting fruit/sweets/beverage flavours in ENDS, regulating modifiable vaping devices and adopting strong health warning messages may reduce the uptake of ENDS among youth.

public, environmental & occupational health,substance abuse
The impact of exposure to FDA e-cigarette authorization messages on product perceptions and interest - an experiment with adults who smoke and youth

Olivia A Wackowski,Michelle Jeong,Stefanie K Gratale,Caitlin Weiger,Julia Chen-Sankey,Andrew A Strasser,Cristine D Delnevo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae141

2024-06-05

Abstract:Introduction: In the United States, e-cigarettes have entered a new regulatory era, needing authorizations from FDA to remain on or enter the marketplace. This study explored the impact of e-cigarette authorization messages on product perceptions and interest. Methods: We conducted an online experiment in June 2022 with nationally-representative samples of adults (21+) who smoke cigarettes (n=866) and youth ages 15-20 (n=859). They were randomized to one of five conditions: viewing an ad for a fictional e-cigarette brand with no reference to FDA (control), an ad with an "authorized for sale by FDA" claim in varying presentation styles (plain text, FDA "approved" stamp, FDA logo), or reading a fictional news excerpt about the product's authorization plus control ad. We compared group differences on product interest, susceptibility, harm perceptions and message perceptions. Results: Among adults who smoke, there were no effects on product interest nor susceptibility, but ratings of the product's harmfulness compared to cigarettes were lower among those in the news versus control condition (β=-0.25, p=.04). Among youth, odds of susceptibility were higher among ever e-cigarette users who viewed the ad with the FDA logo authorization message relative to the control ad (OR=6.3, 95% CI:1.67-23.9, p<0.01). About 40% of all participants agreed the authorization claim makes them think the product is safe to use, but fewer (14-19%) agreed it makes them more interested in trying it. Conclusions: FDA e-cigarette authorization messages may impact some beliefs about product harm. More research is needed to track potential impacts on product use. Implications: This study provides new data about the potential impact of messages about FDA authorization of e-cigarette products (presented as ad claims or a news story) on authorized product perceptions, interest and susceptibility among adults who smoke cigarettes and youth. Our results suggest that FDA e-cigarette authorization messages may impact harm-related beliefs among adults who smoke and product susceptibility among youth who have ever used e-cigarettes before, though real-world effects are likely to be impacted by message type and format, and perceived message source and credibility. Authorization messages are likely to be misinterpreted as "FDA approval" by some; therefore, providing clarifications about authorization meaning and standards are relevant where possible.
Perceptions of FDA-authorized e-cigarettes and use interest among young adults who do not use tobacco

Kathryn La Capria,Kristen R Hamilton-Moseley,Lilianna Phan,Bambi Jewett,Kiana Hacker,Kelvin Choi,Julia Chen-Sankey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/190582

2024-07-29

Abstract:Introduction: It is unclear how young adults who do not use tobacco perceive FDA-authorized e-cigarettes for market entry. This study explored the perceptions and use interests of FDA-authorized e-cigarettes among this population to inform policy decision-making. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with young adults in the US, aged 18-29 years, who do not use tobacco (n=25). Participants viewed images of FDA-authorized e-cigarettes and discussed their perceptions and interest in using these products. We used reflexive thematic analysis to analyze interview data. Results: Many participants stated that they were not interested in using FDA-authorized e-cigarettes because they had little interest in using e-cigarettes in general. Additionally, almost all participants found the tobacco flavor and product design of these products unappealing, which further added to their disinterest. Most reported high trust in the FDA and its authorization process for e-cigarette market entry and considered FDA-authorized e-cigarettes safe to use. Most considered FDA-authorized products less harmful than other (unauthorized) e-cigarettes they saw in daily life but were not more interested in using the authorized products. When given the hypothetical scenario where FDA-authorized products come with a variety of fruit and candy flavors, most participants still expressed little interest in using them, mainly due to the high perceived harm from using any e-cigarette products. Conclusions: Although non-tobacco-using young adults in our study reported low interest in using FDA-authorized e-cigarettes for market entry and e-cigarettes in general, the FDA is recommended to continue to evaluate the impact of flavorings and packages on e-cigarette product appeal to reduce e-cigarette use among young people. The FDA should also examine strategies to effectively communicate the purpose of FDA authorization to the public and emphasize that it does not mean these products are 'approved' or safer than unauthorized products.
Degradation of fibrinogen and fibrin by plasmin and nonplasmin proteases in the chronic subdural hematoma: Evaluation by sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblot

S. Nomura,S. Kashiwagi,Haruhide Ito,Y. Mimura,K. Nakamura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.11501401202

Electrophoresis

Abstract:To characterize local hyperfibrinolysis in the pathogenesis of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), fibrin degradation products (FDPs) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE) to identify each FDP fragment (fragments HMW, YY, DY and DD) by immunoblotting. The electrophoretic patterns of FDP in 40 hematomas from 33 patients could be categorized into 3 patterns; (i) type 1, the sharp DY and DD bands; (ii) type 2, the broad DY and DD bands; and (iii) type 3, the sharp DY and DD with two bands with higher molecular weights than fragment DY and DD. The broadening of DY and DD bands was reproduced by incubating the sample containing sharp DD and DY bands with the hemolysed peripheral blood cells. These results indicated that the hyperfibrinolysis in CSDH could be characterized by the constant and incomplete proteolysis of fibrinogen and fibrin by plasmin and further degradation of FDPs by non‐plasmin proteases released from hemolysed blood cells.
Relative efficacy of cigarillo warning statements in text and pictorial formats: An experimental study among a sample of US young adults

Rime Jebai,Erin L Sutfin,Rachel N Cassidy,Alexandra R Zizzi,Beth A Reboussin,Jennifer Cornacchione Ross

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae228

2024-09-25

Abstract:Introduction: Health warning labels (HWLs) communicate the health risks of cigar use and can decrease use when on cigar packages. This study assessed the relative efficacy of six FDA-proposed individual warning statements in text and pictorial format. Methods: A sample of young adults (ages 18-29) were randomized to a text or pictorial warning condition on generic cigarillo packages. The warning statements were about lung cancer and heart disease; cancers of the mouth and throat; secondhand smoke; not a safe alternative; nicotine/addiction; and harm to baby. Negative emotional reactions, cognitive elaboration, and perceived message effectiveness (PME) were assessed for each warning using linear mixed models. Results: Of the 661 participants, 47.3% reported ever cigarillo smoking, 32.7% current smoking, and 20% were susceptible. In the pictorial format, cancers of the mouth and throat elicited lower levels of anxiety compared to secondhand smoke, not a safe alternative, nicotine/addiction, and harm to baby (ps<0.001). Pictorial HWLs with human imagery induced high anxiety, sadness, fear, and guilt reactions (p<0.001) and higher PME (p=0.011) compared to pictorial HWLs with diseased body parts. Compared to the text HWL cancers of the mouth and throat, the text HWL harm to baby elicited higher anxiety (p=0.003), sadness (p=0.002) and PME (p<0.001). Conclusions: Pictorial HWLs depicting people or human imagery, rather than images of diseased organs or body parts, to represent health effects elicited the most negative emotional reactions, such as anxiety and guilt, and higher PME. Including such images and texts highlighting effects on vulnerable populations like babies can better communicate cigarillo health risks, aiming to curb cigarillo use among young people. Implications: The study suggests that pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) with human imagery significantly enhance the communication of cigarillo smoking risks compared to images of diseased organs. These HWLs evoke stronger emotional responses, particularly anxiety and guilt, and higher perceived message effectiveness by depicting a recognizable person. Furthermore, text-only warnings describing the smoking effect on vulnerable populations such as babies might have a higher impact on young adults. This evidence supports a strategic shift in FDA policies to include such impactful images and texts, which could potentially lead to a significant reduction in cigarillo use among young people. Our findings underscore the urgent need for continued research and implementation of these enhanced warning labels to improve public health outcomes.
Using Eye tracking to Examine Young Adults' Visual Attention to E-cigarette Advertising Features and Associated Positive E-cigarette Perceptions

Julia Chen-Sankey,Caitlin Weiger,Kathryn La Capria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaae018

2024-05-23

Abstract:Background: Little is known about the influence of e-cigarette marketing features on the antecedents of e-cigarette use. Purpose: Using an eye-tracking experiment, we examined visual attention to common features in e-cigarette ads and its associations with positive e-cigarette perceptions among young adults. Methods: Young adults (ages 18-29) who smoke cigarettes (n = 40) or do not use tobacco (n = 71) viewed 30 e-cigarette ads on a computer screen. Eye-tracking technology measured dwell time (fixation duration) and entry time (time to first fixation) for 14 pre-defined ad features. Participants then completed a survey about perceptions of e-cigarettes shown in the ads. We used regression models to examine the associations between ad features and standardized attention metrics among all participants and by tobacco-use status and person-aggregated standardized attention for each ad feature and positive e-cigarette perceptions. Results: Dwell time was the longest for smoker-targeted claims, positive experience claims, and price promotions. Entry time was the shortest for multiple flavor descriptions, nicotine warnings, and people. Those who do not use tobacco had a longer dwell time for minor sales restrictions and longer entry time for purchasing information than those who smoke. Longer dwell time for multiple flavor descriptions was associated with e-cigarette appeal. A shorter entry time for fruit flavor description was associated with positive e-cigarette-use expectancies. Conclusions: Young adults allocated attention differently to various e-cigarette ad features, and such viewing patterns were largely similar by tobacco-use statuses. Multiple or fruit flavors may be the features that contribute to the positive influence of e-cigarette marketing among young adults.
Unintended exposure to e-liquids and subsequent health outcomes among US youth and adults

Juhan Lee,Grace Kong,Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin,Deepa R Camenga

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308006

IF: 3.7

2024-07-30

PLoS ONE

Abstract:This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of oral, ocular, or dermal e-liquid exposure and subsequent outcomes (becoming sick, going to the hospital) in the US. We examined survey data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 5 (2018-2019). The analytic sample included US youth (aged 12-17 years), young adults (aged 18-24 years), and older adults (aged ≥ 25 years) who reported e-cigarette use in the past 12 months. We first determined the prevalence of self-reported e-liquid exposure (in the mouth, skin, or eyes), subsequently "becoming sick" from the exposure, and "going to the hospital" after the exposure. We also examined associations between these outcomes and the device type used (refillable tank /mod system, replaceable prefilled cartridges, disposable/ other device type). E-liquid exposure was reported by 25% of youth (aged 12-17 years), 25% of young adults (aged 18-24 years), and 19% of older adults (aged≥ 25 years). Among individuals reporting e-liquid exposure, subsequent sickness was reported by 10% of youth11% of young adults, and 14% of older adults, and "going to the hospital" was reported by 3.5% of youth, 2.7% of young adults, and 6.8% of older adults. Among young adults, the use of a refillable tank /mod system was associated with higher odds of e-liquid exposure (aOR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.2, 4.1) than the use of other device types, including disposables. The findings suggest that, at a minimum, e-cigarettes/e-liquids may need warning labels that state the risks of e-liquid exposure and packaging regulations that promote device and bottle designs that minimize e-liquid spills.
The effect of branded versus standardized e-cigarette packaging and device designs: an experimental study of youth interest in vaping products

M N Gomes,J L Reid,D Hammond

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.02.001

IF: 4.984

Public Health

Abstract:Objectives: Standardized ('plain') packaging is effective in reducing the appeal of cigarettes among young people. This study examined the impact of plain packaging and brand imagery on interest in trying e-cigarettes among youth. Study design: Experimental design. Methods: Two online experiments were conducted in February 2020 as part of the ITC Youth Tobacco & Vaping Survey, conducted with 13,624 16- to 19-year-olds in Canada, England, and the USA. In the between-group Experiment 1, participants were randomized to view a set of 3 e-cigarette brands, in either their original external packaging ('branded' condition) or standardized olive-green packaging ('standardized' condition), and asked to select the product they would be most interested in trying. The within-group Experiment 2 examined brand imagery directly on devices, including potential differences in appeal among subgroups. Each participant viewed 4 pod-style e-cigarette devices: one 'plain' and 3 in colourful 'skins'. Logistic regression models were conducted to test the effect of condition, adjusting for demographics, smoking and vaping status. Results: In Experiment 1, participants in the 'standardized' packaging condition were significantly more likely to indicate 'I have no interest in trying any of these products' (72.3%) than those in the 'branded' condition (66.9%, AOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.33-1.59). Experiment 2 results indicated differences in e-cigarette appeal by sex in the selection of male- and female-oriented designs, and by cannabis use for a Rastafarian-themed design. Conclusions: Brand imagery on e-cigarettes can target products to specific subgroups. Removal of imagery, in the form of standardized packaging, has the potential to reduce interest in trying e-cigarettes among young people.
HISTOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL FINDINGS IN KRABBE'S LEUCODYSTROPHY

R. Norman,D. Oppenheimer,A. Tingey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.24.3.223

1961-08-01

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract:The familial disease of the cerebral white matter named after Krabbe (1916) may be distinguished histologically from other leucoencephalopathies of early life by the presence of conspicuous nests of macrophage cells, some of large size with several peripherally placed nuclei, lying closely packed around the smaller vessels of the cerebral white matter. The large multinucleated cells were desig- nated 'globoid cells' by Collier and Greenfield (1924), and Greenfield (1958) later gave the name 'epitheli- oid' to smaller mononuclear cells which also help to form the perivascular packets. Both types of cell contain a substance having the histochemical properties of a glycolipid bound to protein (Diezel, 1955; Stammler, Since mononuclear, or sometimes multinuclear, cells containing complex lipid material may be present in other types of diffuse sclerosis it is necessary to stress in the definition of Krabbe's disease relationship of the cell packets to the smaller vessels. are

A DEVICE AND METHOD FOR THE ATRAUMATIC TRANSPORTATION OF THE INJURED PATIENT.

Adenosine and its receptor agonists regulate nitric oxide production and RAW 264.7 macrophages via both receptor binding and its downstream metabolites-inosine.

Contingent Effects of E-Cigarette Warning Label Messages on Cognitive Elaboration and Fear Among U.S. Youth Ages 14–17 by Vaping Experience and Peer Vaping Behavior

US adolescents' response to nicotine warning labels in influencer e-cigarette marketing social media posts: a survey-based randomised between-subject experiment

Effects of reduced nicotine content cigarette advertising with warning labels and social media features on product perceptions among young adults

Impact of Financial Disclosures and Health Warnings on Youth and Young Adult Perceptions of Pro-E-cigarette Instagram Posts

Noticing Voluntary E-Cigarette Warning Labels and Associations With Harm Perceptions and Use Intentions: A Baseline Cross-Sectional Analysis of Wave 4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Prior to the Food and Drug Administration Mandate

The Effect of Graphic Health Warning Labels Placed on the ENDS Device on Young Adult Users’ Experience, Exposure and Intention to Use: A Pilot Study

Effects of a nicotine warning label and vaping cessation resources on young adults’ perceptions of pro-vaping instagram influencer posts

Do Flavor Descriptions Influence Subjective Ratings of Flavored and Unflavored E-liquids Among Nonsmoking and Non-vaping UK Adolescents?

Exploring the opinions and potential impact of unflavoured e-liquid on smoking cessation among people who smoke and smoking relapse among people who previously smoked and now use e-cigarettes: findings from a UK-based mixed methods study

Impact of product-based e-cigarette marketing on the attitudes and behavioural intentions of young Australians: an experimental study

The impact of flavour, device type and warning messages on youth preferences for electronic nicotine delivery systems: evidence from an online discrete choice experiment

The impact of exposure to FDA e-cigarette authorization messages on product perceptions and interest - an experiment with adults who smoke and youth

Perceptions of FDA-authorized e-cigarettes and use interest among young adults who do not use tobacco

Degradation of fibrinogen and fibrin by plasmin and nonplasmin proteases in the chronic subdural hematoma: Evaluation by sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblot

Relative efficacy of cigarillo warning statements in text and pictorial formats: An experimental study among a sample of US young adults

Using Eye tracking to Examine Young Adults' Visual Attention to E-cigarette Advertising Features and Associated Positive E-cigarette Perceptions

Unintended exposure to e-liquids and subsequent health outcomes among US youth and adults

The effect of branded versus standardized e-cigarette packaging and device designs: an experimental study of youth interest in vaping products

HISTOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL FINDINGS IN KRABBE'S LEUCODYSTROPHY