Buffering effects of nonspecifically DNA-bound RNA polymerases in bacteria

Yichen Yan,Tairan Li,Jie Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.04.565427

2024-07-14

Abstract:RNA polymerase (RNAP) is the workhorse of bacterial gene expression, transcribing rRNA and mRNA. Experiments found that a significant fraction of RNAPs in bacteria are nonspecifically bound to DNA, which is puzzling as these idle RNAPs could have produced more RNAs. Whether nonspecifically DNA-bound RNAPs have any function or are merely a consequence of passive interaction between RNAP and DNA is unclear. In this work, we propose that nonspecifically DNA-bound RNAPs buffer the free RNAP concentration and mitigate the crosstalk between rRNA and mRNA transcription. We verify our theory using mean-field models and an agent-based model of transcription, showing that the buffering effects are robust against the interaction between RNAPs and sigma factors and the spatial fluctuation and temporal noise of RNAP concentration. We analyze the relevant parameters of and find that the buffering effects are significant across different growth rates at a low cost, suggesting that nonspecifically DNA-bound RNAPs are evolutionarily advantageous.

Microbiology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper addresses the puzzling phenomenon of a significant fraction of RNA polymerases (RNAPs) in bacteria being nonspecifically bound to DNA, which seems counterintuitive given that these "idle" RNAPs could potentially produce more RNA molecules. The authors propose that these nonspecifically DNA-bound RNAPs serve a crucial role in buffering the concentration of free RNAPs and mitigating the crosstalk between ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA) transcription.

### Key Points:
1. **Problem Statement:**
- A significant fraction (30% to 50%) of RNAPs in bacteria are nonspecifically bound to DNA and do not participate in transcription.
- This phenomenon raises questions about its evolutionary advantage and functional significance, given the finite resources and competition for RNAPs in bacteria.

2. **Proposed Function:**
- The authors hypothesize that nonspecifically DNA-bound RNAPs act as a buffer for the free RNAP concentration, helping to mitigate the crosstalk between rRNA and mRNA transcription.

3. **Model Verification:**
- The hypothesis is verified using mean-field models and an agent-based model of transcription.
- The models show that the buffering effects are robust against the interaction between RNAPs and sigma factors, as well as spatial fluctuations and temporal noise in RNAP concentration.

4. **Analysis of *Escherichia coli*:**
- Relevant parameters for *E. coli* are analyzed, demonstrating that the buffering effects are significant