Abstract:Finding the right balance of quality and quantity can be important, and it is essential that project quality does not drop below the level where important main conclusions are missed or misstated. We use knock-out and over-expression studies as a simplification to test recovery of a known causal gene in RNA-Seq cell line experiments. When single-end RNA-Seq reads are aligned with STAR and quantified with htseq-count, we found potential value in testing the use of the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) implementation of edgeR with robust dispersion estimation more frequently for either single-variate or multi-variate 2-group comparisons (with the possibility of defining criteria less stringent than |fold-change| > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05). When considering a limited number of patient sample comparisons with larger sample size, there might be some decreased variability between methods (except for DESeq1). However, at the same time, the ranking of the gene identified using immunohistochemistry (for ER/PR/HER2 in breast cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas) showed as possible shift in performance compared to the cell line comparisons, potentially highlighting utility for standard statistical tests and/or limma-based analysis with larger sample sizes. If this continues to be true in additional studies and comparisons, then that could be consistent with the possibility that it may be important to allocate time for potential methods troubleshooting for genomics projects. Analysis of public data presented in this study does not consider all experimental designs, and presentation of downstream analysis is limited. So, any estimate from this simplification would be an underestimation of the true need for some methods testing for every project. Additionally, this set of independent cell line experiments has a limitation in being able to determine the frequency of missing a highly important gene if the problem is rare (such as 10% or lower). For example, if there was an assumption that only one method can be tested for “initial” analysis, then it is not completely clear to the extent that using edgeR-robust might perform better than DESeq2 in the cell line experiments. Importantly, we do not wish to cause undue concern, and we believe that it should often be possible to define a gene expression differential expression workflow that is suitable for some purposes for many samples. Nevertheless, at the same time, we provide a variety of measures that we believe emphasize the need to critically assess every individual project and maximize confidence in published results.

Explicit Scale Simulation for analysis of RNA-sequencing with ALDEx2

Beyond Normalization: Incorporating Scale Uncertainty in Microbiome and Gene Expression Analysis

Replacing Normalizations with Interval Assumptions Improves the Rigor and Robustness of Differential Expression and Differential Abundance Analyses

A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data

A statistical normalization method and differential expression analysis for RNA-seq data between different species

Degps is a Powerful Tool for Detecting Differential Expression in RNA-sequencing Studies

SCALE Method for Single-Cell ATAC-seq Analysis Via Latent Feature Extraction

Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis

Depth Normalization of Small RNA Sequencing: Using Data and Biology to Select a Suitable Method

Accounting for technical noise in differential expression analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data

Internal and external normalization of nascent RNA sequencing run-on experiments

Finding the centre: corrections for asymmetry in high-throughput sequencing datasets

Robust identification of regulatory variants (eQTLs) using a differential expression framework developed for RNA-sequencing

Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation

Critical Differential Expression Assessment for Individual Bulk RNA-Seq Projects

A Unified Model for Joint Normalization and Differential Gene Expression Detection in RNA-Seq Data.

Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor

Multi-scale Poisson process approaches for differential expression analysis of high-throughput sequencing data

Variation-preserving normalization unveils blind spots in gene expression profiling

MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data

Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression