Cone-Opponent Ganglion Cells in the Primate Fovea Tuned to Non-Cardinal Color Directions

Tyler Godat,Kendall Kohout,Keith Parkins,Qiang Yang,Juliette E. McGregor,William H. Merigan,David R. Williams,Sara Patterson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.15.557995
2024-02-21
Abstract:A long-standing question in vision science is how the three cone photoreceptor types – long (L), medium (M) and short (S) wavelength sensitive – combine to generate our perception of color. Hue perception can be described along two opponent axes: red-green and blue-yellow. Psychophysical measurements of color appearance indicate that the cone inputs to the red-green and blue-yellow opponent axes are M vs. L+S and L vs. M+S, respectively. However, the “cardinal directions of color space” revealed by psychophysical measurements of color detection thresholds following adaptation are L vs. M and S vs. L+M. These cardinal directions match the most common cone-opponent retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the primate retina. Accordingly, the cone opponency necessary for color appearance is thought to be established in cortex. However, small populations with the appropriate M vs. L+S and L vs. M+S cone-opponency have been reported in large surveys of cone inputs to primate RGCs and their projections to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), yet their existence continues to be debated. Resolving this long-standing open question is necessary because a complete account of the coneopponency in the retinal output is critical for efforts to understand how downstream neural circuits process color. Here, we performed adaptive optics calcium imaging to longitudinally, noninvasively measure foveal RGC light responses in the living macaque eye. We confirm the presence of L vs. M+S and M vs. L+S neurons with non-cardinal coneopponency and demonstrate that cone-opponent signals in the retinal output are more diverse than classically thought.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?