Abstract:BackgroundThe analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data plays an important role in understanding the intrinsic and extrinsic cellular processes in biological and biomedical research. One significant effort in this area is the detection of differentially expressed (DE) genes. scRNAseq data, however, are highly heterogeneous and have a large number of zero counts, which introduces challenges in detecting DE genes. Addressing these challenges requires employing new approaches beyond the conventional ones, which are based on a nonzero difference in average expression. Several methods have been developed for differential gene expression analysis of scRNAseq data. To provide guidance on choosing an appropriate tool or developing a new one, it is necessary to evaluate and compare the performance of differential gene expression analysis methods for scRNAseq data.ResultsIn this study, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of eleven differential gene expression analysis software tools, which are designed for scRNAseq data or can be applied to them. We used simulated and real data to evaluate the accuracy and precision of detection. Using simulated data, we investigated the effect of sample size on the detection accuracy of the tools. Using real data, we examined the agreement among the tools in identifying DE genes, the run time of the tools, and the biological relevance of the detected DE genes.ConclusionsIn general, agreement among the tools in calling DE genes is not high. There is a trade-off between true-positive rates and the precision of calling DE genes. Methods with higher true positive rates tend to show low precision due to their introducing false positives, whereas methods with high precision show low true positive rates due to identifying few DE genes. We observed that current methods designed for scRNAseq data do not tend to show better performance compared to methods designed for bulk RNAseq data. Data multimodality and abundance of zero read counts are the main characteristics of scRNAseq data, which play important roles in the performance of differential gene expression analysis methods and need to be considered in terms of the development of new methods.

Powerful and accurate detection of temporal gene expression patterns from multi-sample multi-stage single cell transcriptomics data with TDEseq

A two-step strategy for detecting differential gene expression in cDNA microarray data

PseudotimeDE: inference of differential gene expression along cell pseudotime with well-calibrated p-values from single-cell RNA sequencing data

DTWscore: Differential Expression and Cell Clustering Analysis for Time-Series Single-Cell RNA-seq Data

Degps is a Powerful Tool for Detecting Differential Expression in RNA-sequencing Studies

Trajectory-based differential expression analysis for single-cell sequencing data

Comprehensive benchmark of differential transcript usage analysis for static and dynamic conditions

SDEvelo: a deep generative approach for transcriptional dynamics with cell-specific latent time and multivariate stochastic modeling

Comparative analysis of differential gene expression analysis tools for single-cell RNA sequencing data

A method for differential expression analysis and pseudo-temporal locating and ordering of genes in single-cell transcriptomic data

scDEA: differential expression analysis in single-cell RNA-sequencing data via ensemble learning

scHD4E: Novel ensemble learning-based differential expression analysis method for single-cell RNA-sequencing data

The Lomb-Scargle periodogram-based differentially expressed gene detection along pseudotime

A statistical framework for differential pseudotime analysis with multiple single-cell RNA-seq samples

Identifying hierarchical cell states and gene signatures with deep exponential families for single-cell transcriptomics

Detecting Differentially Expressed Genes by Relative Entropy.

Unraveling the timeline of gene expression: A pseudotemporal trajectory analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data

STHD: probabilistic cell typing of single Spots in whole Transcriptome spatial data with High Definition

Leveraging neighborhood representations of single-cell data to achieve sensitive DE testing with miloDE

STPDA: Leveraging spatial-temporal patterns for downstream analysis in spatial transcriptomic data

Prediction of Time-Series Transcriptomic Gene Expression Based on Long Short-Term Memory with Empirical Mode Decomposition