Abstract:We have built a neuronal model of decision making. Our model performs a decision based on an imperfect discrimination between highly mixed stimuli, and expresses it with a saccadic eye movement, like real living beings. We use populations of integrate-and-fire neurons. To take a decision that depends on imperfectly separated stimuli, we use a model inspired by the principle of accumulation of evidence. More precisely, this accumulation of evidence is performed by a competition between groups of neurons that model a visual column in the lateral intra-parietal area (area LIP) of the brain. In this column, we have groups of neurons that are sensitive to specific stimuli on which the decision is based. They inhibit each other through groups of inhibitory neurons. Simultaneously, they recursively excite themselves through recurrent synaptic excitation, and all the neurons receive a steady low-level excitation from the rest of the brain. The competition is generated by these recurrent inhibitory and excitatory loops. We study this structure within the framework of dynamical systems. The variables we use are the activities of each group of neurons. This dynamical system has several stable states: one of them occurs when all activities are weak, and other ones when one local group of neurons has a higher activity and dominates the others through lateral inhibition. The convergence to one of these stable states models decision making, guided by sensory evidence. The group of neurons sensitive to the specific stimulus has a comparative advantage on the others during the competition. This structure is not a new idea, but we use it to test our hypothesis on the way the brain controls the dynamics of decision making. Our hypothesis is that the statistical signature of the low-level activity of the brain modifies the stability of the attractors of our model, and thus changes the dynamics of the competition that models decision making. The criterion by which we judge that a decision is taken is more realistic than just looking at the decisive neurons' activities. We model a saccadic eye movement directed by the activities of our LIP neurons, and we read the decision from the position of the eye. This experimental setup is comparable to biophysical experiments in which living beings express their decisions by saccadic eye movements. The neurons of the LIP column in which the decisions take place are modeled as neurons in a real brain: besides the stimuli and the recurrent interactions, they receive significant inputs from the rest of the brain. It is well known that neurons in the brain are highly influenced by this activity, called low-level background activity. We study how the dynamics of the decision making change as a function of the first-order statistics (mean) and second-order statistics (variance) of this global low-level background activity or noise. By studying its influence on the reaction time and error rate, we show that this background activity may be used to control the dynamics of decision making. We compare the performance of such a model (error rate as a function of reaction time) to the performance of living beings during psychophysical experiments. By doing so, we assess the plausibility of the hypothesis that decisions be controlled by the statistical signature of the low-level background activity of the brain.

Neural circuit models for evidence accumulation through choice-selective sequences

Neural population dynamics underlying evidence accumulation in multiple rat brain regions

Unifying and generalizing models of neural dynamics during decision-making

Competing neural representations of choice shape evidence accumulation in humans

Distributed Coding of Evidence Accumulation across the Mouse Brain Using Microcircuits with a Diversity of Timescales

A multi-region recurrent circuit for evidence accumulation in rats

Neural circuit dynamics underlying accumulation of time-varying evidence during perceptual decision making

How cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic subnetworks can shift decision policies to maximize reward rate

Rats and Humans Can Optimally Accumulate Evidence for Decision-Making

Neural circuits for evidence accumulation and decision making in larval zebrafish

Neuronal Model of Decision Making

A simple neural circuit model explains diverse types of integration kernels in perceptual decision-making

Coordinated cross-brain activity during accumulation of sensory evidence and decision commitment

Coherent noise enables probabilistic sequence replay in spiking neuronal networks

Distributed evidence accumulation across macaque large-scale neocortical networks during perceptual decision making

Common neural choice signals can emerge artifactually amidst multiple distinct value signals

Intracranial electroencephalography reveals effector-independent evidence accumulation dynamics in multiple human brain regions

A Decision-Making Model Based on a Spiking Neural Circuit and Synaptic Plasticity.

Common neural choice signals can emerge artefactually amid multiple distinct value signals

Rats optimally accumulate and discount evidence in a dynamic environment