Abstract:Background: In any natural population, mutation is the primary source of genetic variation required for evolutionary novelty and adaptation. Nevertheless, most mutations, especially those with phenotypic effects, are harmful and are consequently removed by natural selection. For this reason, under natural selection, an organism will evolve to a lower mutation rate. Overall, the action of natural selection on mutation rate is related to population size and mutation effects. Although theoretical work has intensively investigated the relationship between natural selection and mutation rate, most of these studies have focused on individual competition within a population, rather than on competition among populations. The aim of the present study was to use computer simulations to investigate how natural selection adjusts mutation rate among asexually reproducing subpopulations with different mutation rates.Results: The competition results for the different subpopulations showed that a population could evolve to an "optimum" mutation rate during long-term evolution, and that this rate was modulated by both population size and mutation effects. A larger population could evolve to a higher optimum mutation rate than could a smaller population. The optimum mutation rate depended on both the fraction and the effects of beneficial mutations, rather than on the effects of deleterious ones. The optimum mutation rate increased with either the fraction or the effects of beneficial mutations. When strongly favored mutations appeared, the optimum mutation rate was elevated to a much higher level. The competition time among the subpopulations also substantially shortened.Conclusions: Competition at the population level revealed that the evolution of the mutation rate in asexual populations was determined by both population size and mutation effects. The most striking finding was that beneficial mutations, rather than deleterious mutations, were the leading force that modulated the optimum mutation rate. The initial configuration of the population appeared to have no effect on these conclusions, confirming the robustness of the simulation method developed in the present study. These findings might further explain the lower mutation rates observed in most asexual organisms, as well as the higher mutation rates in some viruses.

Evidence for the macroevolutionarily optimal mutation rate

Genomic mutation rates that neutralize adaptive evolution and natural selection

experiments uncover a novel mechanism underlying mutation rate evolution in sexually reproducing populations

Rates and Fitness Consequences of New Mutations in Humans

An integrated model of the effects on fitness of beneficial, deleterious, and neutral mutations in sexual populations

Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change

Genetic drift, selection and the evolution of the mutation rate

Impacts of Mutation Effects and Population Size on Mutation Rate in Asexual Populations: A Simulation Study

Re-evaluating evidence for adaptive mutation rate variation

Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation

Accumulation of Spontaneous Mutations in the Ciliate Tetrahymena Thermophila

Response to No gene-specific optimization of mutation rate in Escherichia coli

Mutation rate variability as a driving force in adaptive evolution

A Speed Limit for Evolution: Postscript

The Insect-Killing Bacterium Photorhabdus Luminescens Has the Lowest Mutation Rate among Bacteria

Male mutation rates and the cost of sex for females

Rapid Evolution of Mutation Rate and Spectrum in Response to Environmental and Population-Genetic Challenges

Estimating the proportion of beneficial mutations that are not adaptive in mammals

The Rate of Adaptation in Large Sexual Populations with Linear Chromosomes

Viral evolution under the pressure of an adaptive immune system - optimal mutation rates for viral escape

From Drift to Draft: How Much Do Beneficial Mutations Actually Contribute to Predictions of Ohta’s Slightly Deleterious Model of Molecular Evolution?