Abstract:How people plan is an active area of research in cognitive science, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. However, tasks traditionally used to study planning in the laboratory tend to be constrained to artificial environments, such as Chess and bandit problems. To date there is still no agreed-on model of how people plan in realistic contexts, such as navigation and search, where values intuitively derive from interactions between perception and cognition. To address this gap and move towards a more naturalistic study of planning, we present a novel spatial Maze Search Task (MST) where the costs and rewards are physically situated as distances and locations. We used this task in two behavioral experiments to evaluate and contrast multiple distinct computational models of planning, including optimal expected utility planning, several one-step heuristics inspired by studies of information search, and a family of planners that deviate from optimal planning, in which action values are estimated by the interactions between perception and cognition. We found that people's deviations from optimal expected utility are best explained by planners with a limited horizon, however our results do not exclude the possibility that in human planning action values may be also affected by cognitive mechanisms of numerosity and probability perception. This result makes a novel theoretical contribution in showing that limited planning horizon generalizes to spatial planning, and demonstrates the value of our multi-model approach for understanding cognition. We present a computational study of spatial planning under uncertainty using a novel Maze Search Task (MST), in which people search mazes for probabilistically hidden rewards. The MST is designed to resemble real-life spatial planning, where costs and rewards are physically situated as distances and locations. We found that people's spatial planning is best explained by planners with limited planning horizon, as opposed to both myopic heuristics or the optimal expected utility, showing that a limited planning horizon can generalize to spatial planning tasks. We also find that our results do not exclude the possibility that in human planning action values may be affected by cognitive mechanisms of numerosity and probability perception.

Adaptive planning depth in human problem solving

Intention as Hierarchical Constraints in Human Planning

Expertise increases planning depth in human gameplay

The role of planning in complex problem solving

Fast and Precise: Adjusting Planning Horizon with Adaptive Subgoal Search

Improving Human Decision-Making by Discovering Efficient Strategies for Hierarchical Planning

Prioritization of decisions by importance and difficulty in human planning

People's thinking plans adapt to the problem they're trying to solve

Approximate planning in spatial search

Planning-while-acting: addressing the continuous dynamics of planning and action in a sequential embodied task

The Efficiency of Human Cognition Reflects Planned Information Processing

Eye and hand coarticulation during problem solving reveals hierarchically organized planning

Parsing heuristic and forward search in first-graders' game-play behavior

Scaffolding Task Planning Using Abstract Parsons Problems.

Expert Navigators Deploy Rational Complexity-Based Decision Prioritization for Large-Scale Real-World Planning

Deep hybrid models: infer and plan in a dynamic world

People construct simplified mental representations to plan

Action Selection in Everyday Activities: The Opportunistic Planning Model

Dynamic planning in hierarchical active inference

Automatic discovery and description of human planning strategies

Planning Landscape Analysis for Self-Adaptive Systems