Abstract:How people plan is an active area of research in cognitive science, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. However, tasks traditionally used to study planning in the laboratory tend to be constrained to artificial environments, such as Chess and bandit problems. To date there is still no agreed-on model of how people plan in realistic contexts, such as navigation and search, where values intuitively derive from interactions between perception and cognition. To address this gap and move towards a more naturalistic study of planning, we present a novel spatial Maze Search Task (MST) where the costs and rewards are physically situated as distances and locations. We used this task in two behavioral experiments to evaluate and contrast multiple distinct computational models of planning, including optimal expected utility planning, several one-step heuristics inspired by studies of information search, and a family of planners that deviate from optimal planning, in which action values are estimated by the interactions between perception and cognition. We found that people's deviations from optimal expected utility are best explained by planners with a limited horizon, however our results do not exclude the possibility that in human planning action values may be also affected by cognitive mechanisms of numerosity and probability perception. This result makes a novel theoretical contribution in showing that limited planning horizon generalizes to spatial planning, and demonstrates the value of our multi-model approach for understanding cognition. We present a computational study of spatial planning under uncertainty using a novel Maze Search Task (MST), in which people search mazes for probabilistically hidden rewards. The MST is designed to resemble real-life spatial planning, where costs and rewards are physically situated as distances and locations. We found that people's spatial planning is best explained by planners with limited planning horizon, as opposed to both myopic heuristics or the optimal expected utility, showing that a limited planning horizon can generalize to spatial planning tasks. We also find that our results do not exclude the possibility that in human planning action values may be affected by cognitive mechanisms of numerosity and probability perception.

Approximate planning in spatial search

Intention as Hierarchical Constraints in Human Planning

Previous Knowledge Utilization In Online Anytime Belief Space Planning

Active Information Gathering for Long-Horizon Navigation Under Uncertainty by Learning the Value of Information

Prioritization of decisions by importance and difficulty in human planning

Planning Under Non-Rational Perception of Uncertain Spatial Costs

Proximity-Based Non-uniform Abstractions for Approximate Planning

Psychologically inspired planning method for smart relocation task

The Efficiency of Human Cognition Reflects Planned Information Processing

Expert Navigators Deploy Rational Complexity-Based Decision Prioritization for Large-Scale Real-World Planning

Planning routes across economic terrains: maximizing utility, following heuristics.

Automatic discovery and description of human planning strategies

Attention-Based Planning with Active Perception

Eye Movements Reveal Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Visually-Informed Planning in Navigation

Heuristic Search Via Graphical Structure in Temporal Interval-Based Planning for Deep Space Exploration

Similarities and differences in spatial and non-spatial cognitive maps

Human visual exploration reduces uncertainty about the sensed world

Planning Problems for Sophisticated Agents with Present Bias

Planning under periodic observations: bounds and bounding-based solutions

Approximate Inference for Stochastic Planning in Factored Spaces

Planning Graph Heuristics for Belief Space Search