Abstract:Finding the right balance of quality and quantity can be important, and it is essential that project quality does not drop below the level where important main conclusions are missed or misstated. We use knock-out and over-expression studies as a simplification to test recovery of a known causal gene in RNA-Seq cell line experiments. When single-end RNA-Seq reads are aligned with STAR and quantified with htseq-count, we found potential value in testing the use of the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) implementation of edgeR with robust dispersion estimation more frequently for either single-variate or multi-variate 2-group comparisons (with the possibility of defining criteria less stringent than |fold-change| > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05). When considering a limited number of patient sample comparisons with larger sample size, there might be some decreased variability between methods (except for DESeq1). However, at the same time, the ranking of the gene identified using immunohistochemistry (for ER/PR/HER2 in breast cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas) showed as possible shift in performance compared to the cell line comparisons, potentially highlighting utility for standard statistical tests and/or limma-based analysis with larger sample sizes. If this continues to be true in additional studies and comparisons, then that could be consistent with the possibility that it may be important to allocate time for potential methods troubleshooting for genomics projects. Analysis of public data presented in this study does not consider all experimental designs, and presentation of downstream analysis is limited. So, any estimate from this simplification would be an underestimation of the true need for some methods testing for every project. Additionally, this set of independent cell line experiments has a limitation in being able to determine the frequency of missing a highly important gene if the problem is rare (such as 10% or lower). For example, if there was an assumption that only one method can be tested for “initial” analysis, then it is not completely clear to the extent that using edgeR-robust might perform better than DESeq2 in the cell line experiments. Importantly, we do not wish to cause undue concern, and we believe that it should often be possible to define a gene expression differential expression workflow that is suitable for some purposes for many samples. Nevertheless, at the same time, we provide a variety of measures that we believe emphasize the need to critically assess every individual project and maximize confidence in published results.

General solution to inflated type I and II errors in multi-subject single-cell differential gene expression analysis

Strategies for addressing pseudoreplication in multi-patient scRNA-seq data

Critical Differential Expression Assessment for Individual Bulk RNA-Seq Projects

A comprehensive assessment of cell type-specific differential expression methods in bulk data.

A two-step strategy for detecting differential gene expression in cDNA microarray data

Penalised regression improves imputation of cell-type specific expression using RNA-seq data from mixed cell populations compared to domain-specific methods

Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression

Parameterizing Cell-to-cell Regulatory Heterogeneities Via Stochastic Transcriptional Profiles

Cgcorrect: a Method to Correct for Confounding Cell-Cell Variation Due to Cell Growth in Single-Cell Transcriptomics

A Gene Selection Method for GeneChip Array Data with Small Sample Sizes

A Statistical Framework for the Design of Microarray Experiments and Effective Detection of Differential Gene Expression

Single-cell differential expression analysis between conditions within nested settings

Design and power analysis for multi-sample single cell genomics experiments

Detecting cell-type-specific allelic expression imbalance by integrative analysis of bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing data

2dGBH: Two-dimensional group Benjamini–Hochberg procedure for false discovery rate control in two-way multiple testing of genomic data

The curses of performing differential expression analysis using single-cell data

Inferring Cell-Type-Specific Co-Expressed Genes from Single Cell Data

Could dropping a few cells change the takeaways from differential expression?

A Two-Part Mixed Model for Differential Expression Analysis in Single-Cell High-Throughput Gene Expression Data.

Mixed Directional False Discovery Rate Control in Multiple Pairwise Comparisons Using Weighted P‐values

Pseudobulk with proper offsets has the same statistical properties as generalized linear mixed models in single-cell case-control studies