Abstract:Abstract While the mechanisms of embryonic development are similar between mouse and human, the tempo is in general slower in human. The cause of interspecies differences in developmental time remains a mystery partly due to lack of an appropriate model system 1 . Since murine and human embryos differ in their sizes, geometries, and nutrients, we use in vitro differentiation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) to compare the same type of cells between the species in similar culture conditions. As an example of well-defined developmental time, we focus on the segmentation clock, oscillatory gene expression that regulates the timing of sequential formation of body segments 2–4 . In this way we recapitulate the murine and human segmentation clocks in vitro , showing that the species-specific oscillation periods are derived from cell autonomous differences in the speeds of biochemical reactions. Presomitic mesoderm (PSM)-like cells induced from murine and human PSCs displayed the oscillatory expression of HES7, the core gene of the segmentation clock 5,6 , with oscillation periods of 2-3 hours (mouse PSM) and 5-6 hours (human PSM). Swapping HES7 loci between murine and human genomes did not change the oscillation periods dramatically, denying the possibility that interspecies differences in the sequences of HES7 loci might be the cause of the observed period difference. Instead, we found that the biochemical reactions that determine the oscillation period, such as the degradation of HES7 and delays in its expression, are slower in human PSM compared with those in mouse PSM. With the measured biochemical parameters, our mathematical model successfully accounted for the 2-3-fold period difference between mouse and human. We further demonstrate that the concept of slower biochemical reactions in human cells is generalizable to several other genes, as well as to another cell type. These results collectively indicate that differences in the speeds of biochemical reactions between murine and human cells give rise to the interspecies period difference of the segmentation clock and may contribute to other interspecies differences in developmental time.

Cell-autonomous timing drives the vertebrate segmentation clock's wave pattern

Intercellular Coupling Regulates the Period of the Segmentation Clock

Delayed coupling theory of vertebrate segmentation

Species-specific roles of the Notch ligands, receptors, and targets orchestrating the signaling landscape of the segmentation clock

An analysis of overall network architecture reveals an infinite-period bifurcation underlying oscillation arrest in the segmentation clock

Synchronization of the segmentation clock using synthetic cell-cell signaling

Waves, patterns, bifurcations: A tutorial review on the vertebrate segmentation clock

Waves, patterns and bifurcations: a tutorial review on the vertebrate segmentation clock

Keeping development on time: Insights into post‐transcriptional mechanisms driving oscillatory gene expression during vertebrate segmentation

Sequential pattern formation governed by signaling gradients

Modularity of the segmentation clock and morphogenesis

A Β-Catenin Gradient Links the Clock and Wavefront Systems in Mouse Embryo Segmentation

A Complex Oscillating Network of Signaling Genes Underlies the Mouse Segmentation Clock

FGF Signaling Acts Upstream of the NOTCH and WNT Signaling Pathways to Control Segmentation Clock Oscillations in Mouse Somitogenesis.

Substrate Rigidity Modulates Segmentation Clock Dynamics in Isolated Presomitic Mesoderm Cells

Controlling human organoid symmetry breaking reveals signaling gradients drive segmentation clock waves

Regeneration of the human segmentation clock in somitoids in vitro

Metabolic activities are selective modulators for individual segmentation clock processes

Delay-managed tradeoff in the molecular dynamics of the segmentation clock.

Intrinsic noise, Delta-Notch signalling and delayed reactions promote sustained, coherent, synchronised oscillations in the presomitic mesoderm

Species-specific oscillation periods of human and mouse segmentation clocks are due to cell autonomous differences in biochemical reaction parameters