Abstract:Understanding the expansion of the Universe remains a profound challenge in fundamental physics. The complexity of solving general relativity equations in the presence of intricate, inhomogeneous flows has compelled cosmological models to rely on perturbation theory in a homogeneous Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker background. This approach accounts for a redshift of light encompassing contributions from both the cosmological background expansion along the photon's trajectory and Doppler effects at emission due to peculiar motions. However, this computation of the redshift is not covariant, as it hinges on specific coordinate choices that may distort physical interpretations of the relativity of motion. In this study we show that peculiar motions, when tracing the dynamics along time-like geodesics, must contribute to the redshift of light through a local volume expansion factor, in addition to the background expansion. By employing a covariant approach to redshift calculation, we address the central question of whether the cosmological principle alone guarantees that the averaged local volume expansion factor matches the background expansion. We establish that this holds true only in scenarios characterised by a reversible evolution of the Universe, where inhomogeneous expansion and compression modes compensate for one another. In the presence of irreversible processes, such as the dissipation of large-scale compression modes through matter virialisation and associated entropy production, the averaged expansion factor becomes dominated by expansion in voids that can no longer be compensated for by compression in virialised structures. Furthermore, for a universe in which a substantial portion of its mass has undergone virialisation, adhering to the background evolution on average leads to significant violations of the second law of thermodynamics. Our approach shows that entropy production due to irreversible processes during the formation of structures plays the same role as an effective, time-dependent cosmological constant (i.e. dynamical dark energy) without the need to invoke new unknown physics. Our findings underscore the imperative need to re-evaluate the influence of inhomogeneities and irreversible processes on cosmological models, shedding new light on the intricate dynamics of our Universe.

Cosmology and the massive photon frequency shift in the Standard-Model Extension

Supernovae and photon frequency shift induced by the Standard-Model Extension

Photon frequency variation in non-linear electro-magnetism

Massive photons from Super and Lorentz symmetry breaking

High redshift cosmography: new results and implication for dark energy

Red and blue shift in spherical and axisymmetric spacetimes and astrophysical constraints

Late-time phenomenology required to solve the tension in view of the cosmic ladders and the anisotropic and angular BAO datasets

Global Observations from PHOBOS

Investigating Dark Energy Equation of State With High Redshift Hubble Diagram

On Redshift Evolution & Negative Dark Energy Density in Pantheon+ Supernovae

Late-time phenomenology required to solve the $H_0$ tension in view of the cosmic ladders and the anisotropic and angular BAO data sets

Re-evaluating the cosmological redshift: Insights into inhomogeneities and irreversible processes

Negative cosmological constant in the dark energy sector: tests from JWST photometric and spectroscopic observations of high-redshift galaxies

Reevaluating the cosmological redshift: insights into inhomogeneities and irreversible processes

Scalar potential model of redshift and discrete redshift

New Constraints from High Redshift Supernovae and Lensing Statistics upon Scalar Field Cosmologies

On redshift evolution and negative dark energy density in Pantheon + Supernovae

A Step in understanding the Hubble tension

From infinite to infinitesimal: Using the Universe as a dataset to probe Casimir corrections to the vacuum energy from fields inhabiting the dark dimension

Red Shift in a Laboraory Environment

How Dark is Dark Energy?