Abstract:The topological classification of hermitian operators is solely determined by the presence or absence of certain discrete symmetries. For non-hermitian operators we in addition need to specify the type of spectral gap. They come in the flavor of a point gap or a line gap. Since the presence of a line gap implies the existence of a point gap, there is usually more than one mathematical classification applicable to a physical system. That raises the question: which of these gap-type classifications is physically meaningful? To decide this question, I propose a simple criterion, namely the choice of physically relevant states. This generalizes the notion of Fermi projection that plays a crucial role in the topological classification of fermionic condensed matter systems, and enters as an auxiliary quantity in the bulk classification of photonic and magnonic crystals. After that the classification is entirely algorithmic, the system's topology is encoded in (pairs of) projections with symmetries and constraints. A crucial point in my investigation is the relevance of diagonalizability. Even for existing topological classifications of non-hermitian systems diagonalizability needs to be assumed to ensure that continuous deformations of the hamiltonian lead to continuous deformations of the spectra, projections and unitaries.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about how to select topologically meaningful classifications in the topological classification of non - Hermitian systems. Specifically, the author explores which type of gap classification is more meaningful for physical systems in the presence of point gaps and line gaps. In addition, the author also emphasizes the importance of diagonalizability in the topological classification of non - Hermitian systems. ### Core problems of the paper 1. **Selecting physically meaningful topological classifications**: - For non - Hermitian operators, in addition to discrete symmetries, the type of spectral gap (point gap or line gap) needs to be specified. Since the existence of a line gap implies the existence of a point gap, a physical system can usually be subject to multiple mathematical classifications. - The question is: which of these gap - type classifications is physically meaningful? 2. **The importance of diagonalizability**: - Even for the existing topological classification of non - Hermitian systems, diagonalizability needs to be assumed to ensure that the continuous deformation of the Hamiltonian leads to the continuous deformation of the spectrum, projection, and unitary operator. - If the operator is not diagonalizable, its spectral gap may suddenly close, resulting in discontinuous deformation of the spectral projection and the spectrally flattened Hamiltonian, so that the formula for the topological invariant may become undefined. ### Solutions The author proposes a selection criterion based on physically relevant states to determine physically meaningful classifications: - **Selecting physically relevant states**: Select the relevant spectral part \(\sigma_{\text{rel}}\) according to the physical characteristics of the system, that is, single out the states related to a specific spectral region. - **Defining the projection of relevant states**: Define the projection \(P_{\text{rel}}\) of relevant states through contour integration: \[ P_{\text{rel}}=\frac{i}{2\pi}\oint_{\Gamma(\sigma_{\text{rel}})}dz(H - z)^{-1} \] where \(\Gamma(\sigma_{\text{rel}})\) is a contour enclosing only \(\sigma_{\text{rel}}\). - **Considering symmetries and constraints**: The symmetries of the Hamiltonian \(H\) and the relevant spectrum \(\sigma_{\text{rel}}\) will lead to the symmetries and constraints of the relevant projection \(P_{\text{rel}}\). - **Classifying projections with symmetries and constraints**: Finally, classify the (paired) projections with symmetries and constraints. ### Assumption of diagonalizability To ensure that \(P_{\text{rel}}\) is well - defined, the author assumes that the Hamiltonian \(H\) is a diagonalizable bounded operator and has a bounded inverse operator: \[ \text{Assumption I.1}: H\text{ is a diagonalizable bounded operator with a bounded inverse operator.} \] ### Summary The core of the paper is to provide a physically meaningful topological classification method for non - Hermitian systems and emphasize the crucial role of diagonalizability in this process. By selecting physically relevant states and defining the corresponding projections, the author provides a new perspective for the topological classification of non - Hermitian systems.

On Choosing a Physically Meaningful Topological Classification for Non-Hermitian Systems and the Issue of Diagonalizability

Topological Classification of Insulators: I. Non-interacting Spectrally-Gapped One-Dimensional Systems

Topological classification of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with frequency dependence

Towards a classification of mixed-state topological orders in two dimensions

Non-Hermitian Topology in Hermitian Topological Matter

Classifying Order-Two Spatial Symmetries in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians: Point-gapped AZ and AZ$^†$ Classes

Dual Symmetry Classification of Non-Hermitian Systems and $\mathbb{Z}_2$ Point-Gap Topology of a Non-Unitary Quantum Walk

M ay 2 01 9 Non-Hermitian Topological Invariants in Real Space

Topological Order in the Spectral Riemann Surfaces of Non-Hermitian Systems

Toward a classification of PT-symmetric quantum systems: From dissipative dynamics to topology and wormholes

Symmetry and topological classification of Floquet non-Hermitian systems

Homotopy, Symmetry, and Non-Hermitian Band Topology

Non-Hermitian Topological Phases: Principles and Prospects

Dynamical Classification of Topological Quantum Phases

Topological phases of many-body non-Hermitian systems

Non-chiral non-Bloch invariants and topological phase diagram in non-unitary quantum dynamics without chiral symmetry

Exceptional Classifications of Non-Hermitian Systems

Critical non-Hermitian topology induced quantum sensing

Topological Phases of Non-Hermitian Systems

Quantized polarization and Majorana fermions beyond tenfold classification