Quantum epistemology and constructivism

Patrick Fraser,Nuriya Nurgalieva,Lídia del Rio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-023-09717-4
2023-07-30
Abstract:Constructivist epistemology posits that all truths are knowable. One might ask to what extent constructivism is compatible with naturalized epistemology and knowledge obtained from inference-making using successful scientific theories. If quantum theory correctly describes the structure of the physical world, and if quantum theoretic inferences about which measurement outcomes will be observed with unit probability count as knowledge, we demonstrate that constructivism cannot be upheld. Our derivation is compatible with both intuitionistic and quantum propositional logic. This result is implied by the Frauchiger-Renner theorem, though it is of independent importance as well.
Quantum Physics,Logic
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to explore and solve the compatibility problem between constructivist epistemology and naturalist epistemology in the context of quantum theory. Specifically, by analyzing the predictions of quantum theory on measurement results and their knowledge states, the authors show that from a naturalist perspective, if quantum theory is the correct theory for describing the physical world and the inferences of quantum theory are regarded as knowledge, then constructivist epistemology cannot hold. This conclusion is mainly based on the Frauchiger - Renner theorem, which shows that within the framework of quantum theory, certain knowledge assumptions about measurement results cannot hold simultaneously. The paper further discusses the impact of this result on Fitch's paradox, pointing out that quantum epistemology will not lead to Fitch's paradox under certain basic assumptions, thus providing a naturalist solution to a challenge in classical epistemology.