Abstract:Understanding the expansion of the Universe remains a profound challenge in fundamental physics. The complexity of solving general relativity equations in the presence of intricate, inhomogeneous flows has compelled cosmological models to rely on perturbation theory in a homogeneous Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker background. This approach accounts for a redshift of light encompassing contributions from both the cosmological background expansion along the photon's trajectory and Doppler effects at emission due to peculiar motions. However, this computation of the redshift is not covariant, as it hinges on specific coordinate choices that may distort physical interpretations of the relativity of motion. In this study we show that peculiar motions, when tracing the dynamics along time-like geodesics, must contribute to the redshift of light through a local volume expansion factor, in addition to the background expansion. By employing a covariant approach to redshift calculation, we address the central question of whether the cosmological principle alone guarantees that the averaged local volume expansion factor matches the background expansion. We establish that this holds true only in scenarios characterised by a reversible evolution of the Universe, where inhomogeneous expansion and compression modes compensate for one another. In the presence of irreversible processes, such as the dissipation of large-scale compression modes through matter virialisation and associated entropy production, the averaged expansion factor becomes dominated by expansion in voids that can no longer be compensated for by compression in virialised structures. Furthermore, for a universe in which a substantial portion of its mass has undergone virialisation, adhering to the background evolution on average leads to significant violations of the second law of thermodynamics. Our approach shows that entropy production due to irreversible processes during the formation of structures plays the same role as an effective, time-dependent cosmological constant (i.e. dynamical dark energy) without the need to invoke new unknown physics. Our findings underscore the imperative need to re-evaluate the influence of inhomogeneities and irreversible processes on cosmological models, shedding new light on the intricate dynamics of our Universe.

Interpretations of cosmic expansion: anchoring conceptions and misconceptions

Mapping the cosmological expansion

On space-time structure and the Universe: some issues of concept and principle

100 Years of Relativistic Cosmology (1917-2017). Part I: From Origins to the Discovery of Universal Expansion (1929)

Stasis in an expanding universe: A recipe for stable mixed-component cosmological eras

Reevaluating the cosmological redshift: insights into inhomogeneities and irreversible processes

Re-evaluating the cosmological redshift: Insights into inhomogeneities and irreversible processes

Does cosmological expansion affect local physics?

Cosmic anti-friction and accelerated expansion

Isogrowth Cosmology (and How to Map the Universe)

Cosmology in Minkowski space

What if the universe expands linearly? A local general relativity to solve the "zero active mass" problem

Accelerated Expansion as Predicted by an Ether Theory of Gravitation

Relativistic gravity in the inhomogeneous Universe

Cosmic antifriction and accelerated expansion

On the convergence of cosmographic expansions in Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi models

Adventures in Friedmann Cosmology: An Educationally Detailed Expansion of the Cosmological Friedmann Equations

Cosmic Acceleration from Causal Backreaction in a Smoothly Inhomogeneous Universe

Did the Big Bang and cosmic inflation really happen? (A tale of alternative cosmological models)

Hubble's diagram and cosmic expansion