Airborne dispersion of droplets during coughing: a physical model of viral transmission

Hongying Li,Fong Yew Leong,George Xu,Chang Wei Kang,Keng Hui Lim,Ban Hock Tan,Chian Min Loo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84245-2
2020-08-05
Abstract:The Covid-19 pandemic has focused attention on airborne transmission of viruses. Using realistic air flow simulation, we model droplet dispersion from coughing and study the transmission risk related to SARS-CoV-2. Although most airborne droplets are 8-16 $\mu$m in diameter, the droplets with the highest transmission potential are, in fact, 32-40 $\mu$m. Use of face masks is therefore recommended for both personal and social protection. We found social distancing effective at reducing transmission potential across all droplet sizes. However, the presence of a human body 1 m away modifies the aerodynamics so that downstream droplet dispersion is enhanced, which has implications on safe distancing in queues. Based on median viral load, we found that an average of 0.55 viral copies is inhaled at 1 m distance per cough. Droplet evaporation results in significant reduction in droplet counts, but airborne transmission remains possible even under low humidity conditions.
Fluid Dynamics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to study the airborne transmission risk of SARS - CoV - 2 (COVID - 19) by establishing a physical model to simulate the aerial dispersion of aerosol particles during coughing. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Size distribution of aerosol particles and their transmission potential**: The study found that although the diameter of most aerosol particles is between 8 - 16 micrometers, the particles with the highest transmission potential are actually between 32 - 40 micrometers. These larger particles, due to their larger volume, contain more virus copies and thus have a higher transmission risk. 2. **Effectiveness of masks and personal protection**: The paper recommends the use of masks because masks can effectively block larger aerosol particles, thereby reducing virus transmission. 3. **Effect of social distancing**: Research shows that maintaining social distance can significantly reduce the transmission risk of all - sized particles. In particular, increasing the distance from 0.5 meters to 1 meter can significantly reduce the exposure risk of large particles greater than 75 micrometers; further increasing it to 2 meters can further reduce the transmission risk of all particles. 4. **Impact of the human body on aerosol dispersion**: When a person stands 1 meter away, it will change the airflow dynamics, resulting in an increased dispersion range of aerosol particles, which may pose new challenges to the safe distance during queuing. 5. **Aerosol behavior under low - humidity conditions**: Under low - humidity conditions, small particles will rapidly evaporate and nucleate, while medium - sized particles can last for several seconds in the air. These evaporated nuclei contain a high concentration of the virus and may cause long - distance airborne transmission risks. 6. **Assessment of virus inhalation amount**: Based on the median viral load, the study found that at a distance of 1 meter, an average of 0.55 virus copies are inhaled per cough. Although this number seems low, the cumulative risk still exists in cases of multiple coughs or high viral loads. Through these studies, the paper aims to provide a scientific basis for public health policies, especially when formulating guidelines for social distancing and mask - wearing.