Abstract:Causal effects are commonly defined as comparisons of the potential outcomes under treatment and control, but this definition is threatened by the possibility that either the treatment or the control condition is not well defined, existing instead in more than one version. This is often a real possibility in nonexperimental or observational studies of treatments because these treatments occur in the natural or social world without the laboratory control needed to ensure identically the same treatment or control condition occurs in every instance. We consider the simplest case: Either the treatment condition or the control condition exists in two versions that are easily recognized in the data but are of uncertain, perhaps doubtful, relevance, for example, branded Advil versus generic ibuprofen. Common practice does not address versions of treatment: Typically, the issue is either ignored or explicitly stated but assumed to be absent. Common practice is reluctant to address two versions of treatment because the obvious solution entails dividing the data into two parts with two analyses, thereby (a) reducing power to detect versions of treatment in each part, (b) creating problems of multiple inference in coordinating the two analyses, and (c) failing to report a single primary analysis that uses everyone. We propose and illustrate a new method of analysis that begins with a single primary analysis of everyone that would be correct if the two versions do not differ, adds a second analysis that would be correct were there two different effects for the two versions, controls the family-wise error rate in all assertions made by the several analyses, and yet pays no price in power to detect a constant treatment effect in the primary analysis of everyone. Our method can be applied to analyses of constant additive treatment effects on continuous outcomes. Unlike conventional simultaneous inferences, the new method is coordinating several analyses that are valid under different assumptions, so that one analysis would never be performed if one knew for certain that the assumptions of the other analysis are true. It is a multiple assumptions problem rather than a multiple hypotheses problem. We discuss the relative merits of the method with respect to more conventional approaches to analyzing multiple comparisons. The method is motivated and illustrated using a study of the possibility that repeated head trauma in high school football causes an increase in risk of early onset cognitive decline.

Within-Person Variability Score-Based Causal Inference: A Two-Step Estimation for Joint Effects of Time-Varying Treatments

Estimating curvilinear time-varying treatment effects: Combining g-estimation of structural nested mean models with time-varying effect models for longitudinal causal inference.

11. Identification and Estimation of Causal Effects with Time-Varying Treatments and Time-Varying Outcomes

Causal Inference using Multivariate Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models with Longitudinal Data

Causality for Complex Continuous-time Functional Longitudinal Studies with Dynamic Treatment Regimes

Incorporating Auxiliary Variables to Improve the Efficiency of Time-Varying Treatment Effect Estimation

Estimating individualized treatment rules in longitudinal studies with covariate-driven observation times

Estimating Time-Varying Direct and Indirect Causal Excursion Effects with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes

Adaptive sparsening and smoothing of the treatment model for longitudinal causal inference using outcome-adaptive LASSO and marginal fused LASSO

Causal Inference for a Hidden Treatment

Causal Effects for Time-Varying Treatments and Outcomes 2 Composite Causal Effects for Time-Varying Treatments and Time-Varying Outcomes

High-dimensional model-assisted inference for treatment effects with multi-valued treatments

Doubly Robust Identification of Causal Effects of a Continuous Treatment using Discrete Instruments

Estimating treatment effects from single-arm trials via latent-variable modeling

Estimating Time‐Varying Exposure Effects Through Continuous‐Time Modelling in Mendelian Randomization

Estimating Individual Causal Treatment Effect by Variable Decomposition

Causal Inference With Two Versions of Treatment

Propensity Score Regression for Causal Inference with Treatment Heterogeneity

Causal effect estimation in survival analysis with high dimensional confounders

Structural Nested Mean Models Under Parallel Trends Assumptions

Two Stage Least Squares with Time-Varying Instruments: An Application to an Evaluation of Treatment Intensification for Type-2 Diabetes