Abstract:Background: Identifying practice-ready evidence-based journal articles in medicine is a challenge due to the sheer volume of biomedical research publications. Newer approaches to support evidence discovery apply deep learning techniques to improve the efficiency and accuracy of classifying sound evidence. Objective: To determine how well deep learning models using variants of Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) identify high-quality evidence with high clinical relevance from the biomedical literature for consideration in clinical practice. Methods: We fine-tuned variations of BERT models (BERTBASE, BioBERT, BlueBERT, and PubMedBERT) and compared their performance in classifying articles based on methodological quality criteria. The dataset used for fine-tuning models included titles and abstracts of >160,000 PubMed records from 2012 to 2020 that were of interest to human health which had been manually labeled based on meeting established critical appraisal criteria for methodological rigor. The data was randomly divided into 80:10:10 sets for training, validating, and testing. In addition to using the full unbalanced set, the training data was randomly undersampled into four balanced datasets to assess performance and select the best performing model. For each of the four sets, one model that maintained sensitivity (recall) at ≥99% was selected and were ensembled. The best performing model was evaluated in a prospective, blinded test and applied to an established reference standard, the Clinical Hedges dataset. Results: In training, three of the four selected best performing models were trained using BioBERTBASE. The ensembled model did not boost performance compared with the best individual model. Hence a solo BioBERT-based model (named DL-PLUS) was selected for further testing as it was computationally more efficient. The model had high recall (>99%) and 60% to 77% specificity in a prospective evaluation conducted with blinded research associates and saved >60% of the work required to identify high quality articles. Conclusions: Deep learning using pretrained language models and a large dataset of classified articles produced models with improved specificity while maintaining >99% recall. The resulting DL-PLUS model identifies high-quality, clinically relevant articles from PubMed at the time of publication. The model improves the efficiency of a literature surveillance program, which allows for faster dissemination of appraised research.

Evidence Inference 2.0: More Data, Better Models

Inferring Which Medical Treatments Work from Reports of Clinical Trials

NLI4CT: Multi-Evidence Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trial Reports

Benchmarking Large Language Models in Evidence-Based Medicine

Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study

Jointly Extracting Interventions, Outcomes, and Findings from RCT Reports with LLMs

Automated tabulation of clinical trial results: A joint entity and relation extraction approach with transformer-based language representations

Deep learning to refine the identification of high-quality clinical research articles from the biomedical literature: Performance evaluation

Automated information extraction model enhancing traditional Chinese medicine RCT evidence extraction (Evi-BERT): algorithm development and validation

Using LLMs to label medical papers according to the CIViC evidence model

Biomedical evidence engineering for data-driven discovery

EvidenceMap: a three-level knowledge representation for medical evidence computation and comprehension

Understanding Clinical Trial Reports: Extracting Medical Entities and Their Relations

A Deep Learning Approach to Refine the Identification of High-Quality Clinical Research Articles From the Biomedical Literature: Protocol for Algorithm Development and Validation

Neural language models for text classification in evidence-based medicine

Retrieve to Explain: Evidence-driven Predictions with Language Models

Performance of two large language models for data extraction in evidence synthesis

Sebis at SemEval-2023 Task 7: A Joint System for Natural Language Inference and Evidence Retrieval from Clinical Trial Reports

Predicting Clinical Trial Results by Implicit Evidence Integration

A clinical trials corpus annotated with UMLS entities to enhance the access to evidence-based medicine

SemEval-2024 Task 2: Safe Biomedical Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials