Abstract:It has been shown recently that the anomalies observed in \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(*\right)}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) and \( \overline{B}\to \overline{K}{\ell}^{+}{\ell}^{-} \) decays could be resolved with just one scalar leptoquark. Fitting to the current data on R(D(∗)) along with acceptable q 2 distributions in \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) decays, four best-fit solutions for the operator coefficients have been found. In this paper, we explore the possibilities of how to discriminate these four solutions. Firstly, we find that two of them are already excluded by the decay \( {B}_c^{-}\to {\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \), because the predicted decay widths have already overshot the total width ΓBc . It is then found that the remaining two solutions result in two effective Hamiltonians governing \( b\to c\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) transition, which differ by a sign and enhance the absolute value of the coefficient of \( {\overline{c}}_L{\gamma}_{\mu }{b}_L{\overline{\tau}}_L{\gamma}^{\mu }{\nu}_{\tau\ L} \) operator by about 12%. However, they give nearly the same predictions as in the SM for the D ∗ and τ longitudinal polarizations as well as the lepton forward-backward asymmetries in \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) decays. For the other observables like \( \mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({B}_c^{-}\to {\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau}\right),\mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({B}_c^{-}\to \gamma {\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau}\right),{R}_{D\left(\ast \right)}\left({q}^2\right),\ \mathrm{d}\mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left(\overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau}\right)/\mathrm{d}{q}^2 \) and \( \mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({B}_c^{-}\to {X}_3\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau}\right) \), on the other hand, the two solutions give sizable enhancements relative to the SM predictions. With measurement of \( {B}_c^{-}\to {\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) at LHCb and refined measurements of observables in \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) at both LHCb and Belle-II, such a specific NP scenario could be further deciphered.

A proposal to the '$\frac{1}{2}$ vs. $\frac{3}{2}$ puzzle'

Study Of Semileptonic Decays B-S -> D-S1(2536)L(Nu)Over-Bar And B-S -> D-S2(2573)L(Nu)Over-Bar In The Cqm Model

Investigations on the weak decays of $D\bar{B}$ molecules

Hidden strangeness in meson weak decays to baryon pair

Using $Λ_b^0(6146)$ and $Λ_b^0(6152)$ as probes to investigate possible $\bar{B}^{}N$ and $D^{}N$ molecules

Production of $D^_{s0}(2317)$ and $D_{s1}(2460)$ in $B$ decays as $D^{()}K$ and $D^{(*)}_sη$ molecules

Probing new physics in class-I B-meson decays into heavy-light final states

Transition form factors of B decays into p-wave axial-vector mesons in the perturbative QCD approach

$\bar{B}_s^0 \to D_{s1}(2460)^+ K^-, D_{s1}(2536)^+ K^-$ and the nature of the two $D_{s1}$ resonance

Study Of B-S -> D-Sj(2317,2460)L(Nu)Over-Bar Semileptonic Decays In The Cqm Model

Revisiting the One Leptoquark Solution to the R ( D (∗) ) Anomalies and Its Phenomenological Implications

$V_{cb}$ puzzle in semi-leptonic $B\to D^*$ decays revisited

Study on $B_s\to D_{sJ}(2317,2460)l\bar{\nu}$ Semileptonic Decays in the CQM Model

Explaining the $B_{d(s)} \rightarrow K^{(\ast)}\bar{K}^{(\ast)}$ puzzle via chiral-flip in $R$-parity violating MSSM with seesaw mechanism

Productions of $X(3872)$, $Z_c(3900)$, $X_2(4013)$, and $Z_c(4020)$ in $B_{(s)}$ decays offer strong clues on their molecular nature

$B_s\to D_s(3040)$ form factors and $B_s$ decays into $D_s(3040)$

A new puzzle in non-leptonic B decays

Semileptonic decays of D-(s) mesons

Probing D s 0 * ( 2317 ) in the decays of B to two charmed mesons

Study of semileptonic decays B_s →D_(s1)(2536)l and B_s →D_(s2)(2573)l in the CQM model

Bs1(5830)andBs2*(5840)