Abstract:In this study, using idealized step-forcing simulations, we examine the effective radiative forcing of CH4 relative to that of CO2 and compare the effects of CH4 and CO2 forcing on the climate system. A tenfold increase in CH4 concentration in the NCAR CAM5 climate model produces similar long term global mean surface warming (~ 1.7 K) as a one-third increase in CO2 concentration. However, the radiative forcing estimated for CO2 using the prescribed-SST method is ~ 81% that of CH4, indicating that the efficacy of CH4 forcing is ~ 0.81. This estimate is nearly unchanged when the CO2 physiological effect is included in our simulations. Further, for the same long-term global mean surface warming, we simulate a smaller precipitation increase in the CH4 case compared to the CO2 case. This is because of the fast adjustment processes—precipitation reduction in the CH4 case is larger than that of the CO2 case. This is associated with a relatively more stable atmosphere and larger atmospheric radiative forcing in the CH4 case which occurs because of near-infrared absorption by CH4 in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. Within a month after an increase in CH4, this shortwave heating results in a temperature increase of ~ 0.8 K in the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere. In contrast, within a month after a CO2 increase, longwave cooling results in a temperature decrease of ~ 3 K in the stratosphere and a small change in the upper troposphere. These fast adjustments in the lower stratospheric and upper tropospheric temperature, along with the adjustments in clouds in the troposphere, influence the effective radiative forcing and the fast precipitation response. These differences in fast climate adjustments also produce differences in the climate states from which the slow response begins to evolve and hence they are likely associated with differing feedbacks. We also find that the tropics and subtropics are relatively warmer in the CH4 case for the same global mean surface warming because of a larger longwave clear-sky and shortwave cloud forcing over these regions in the CH4 case. Further investigation using a multi-model intercomparison framework would permit an assessment of the robustness of our results.

Comment on "Collision and radiative processes in emission of atmospheric carbon dioxide"

Climate Response to Carbon Dioxide Forcing and SolarRadiation Forcing on Different Time Scales

Global Warming: some back-of-the-envelope calculations

Comments on the Paper `A new basic 1-dimensional 1-layer model obtains excellent agreement with the observed Earth temperature' by Rainer Link and Horst-Joachim Lüdecke

Saturation of the Infrared Absorption by Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere

Importance Of Carbon Dioxide Physiological Forcing To Future Climate Change

An estimate of equilibrium sensitivity of global terrestrial carbon cycle using NCAR CCSM4

Climate Sensitivity and the Response of Temperature to CO$_2$

Does Shortwave Absorption by Methane Influence Its Effectiveness?

Why Must a Solar Forcing Be Larger Than a CO 2 Forcing to Cause the Same Global Mean Surface Temperature Change?

The role of greenhouse gases in radiative equilibrium – Thermodynamic evaluation

Simulated Carbon Cycle and Earth System Response to Atmospheric CO2 Removal

Dynamic responses of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration to global temperature changes between 1850 and 2010

Greenhouse effect from the point of view of radiative transfer

Fermi Resonance and the Quantum Mechanical Basis of Global Warming

The Upper Atmospheres of Terrestrial Planets: Carbon Dioxide Cooling and the Earth's Thermospheric Evolution

Dependence of Earth's Thermal Radiation on Five Most Abundant Greenhouse Gases

The Climate Response to the Changing Greenhouse Gas Concentration in the Atmosphere

Is There a Stratospheric Radiative Feedback in Global Warming Simulations?

Infrared Radiative Effects of Increasing CO2 and CH4 on the Atmosphere in Antarctica Compared to the Arctic

Revisiting the scattering greenhouse effect of CO2 ice clouds