The Ramsey Number for a Forest Versus Disjoint Union of Complete Graphs

Sinan Hu,Yuejian Peng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-023-02625-z
2023-02-27
Graphs and Combinatorics
Abstract:Given two graphs G and H , the Ramsey number R ( G ,  H ) is the minimum integer N such that any coloring of the edges of in red or blue yields a red G or a blue H . Let be the chromatic number of G , and s ( G ) denote the chromatic surplus of G , the cardinality of a minimum color class taken over all proper colorings of G with colors. A connected graph G is called H -good if . Chvátal (J. Graph Theory 1:93, 1977) showed that any tree is -good for , where denotes a complete graph with m vertices. Let tH denote the union of t disjoint copies of graph H . Sudarsana et al. (Comput. Sci. 6196, Springer, Berlin, 2010) proved that the n -vertex path is -good for and , and conjectured that any n -vertex tree is -good. In this paper, we confirm this conjecture and prove that is -good for and . We also prove a conclusion which yields that is -good, where is the disjoint union of and , . Furthermore, we extend the Ramsey goodness of connected graphs to disconnected graphs and study the relation between the Ramsey number of the components of a disconnected graph versus a graph H . We show that if each component of a graph F is H -good, then F is H -good. Our result implies the exact value of , where F is a forest and .
mathematics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?