Abstract:Introduction: In sports competitions, judge scoring data serve as an objective measure of an athlete's performance level. However, research has indicated the unreliability of objective measurements. Controversy often arises regarding the quality of judge scoring data, undermining fairness and justice in sports competitions. Method: This paper proposes a method utilizing the Kendall covariance coefficient and the Kendall correlation coefficient for the thorough evaluation of judging data quality in diving events. The analysis is structured around four key elements: overall competition, individual divers, specific rounds, and distinct diving techniques. Each element is analyzed across three dimensions: the collective data quality from the judging panel, interjudge data quality comparisons, and the alignment of individual judges' scores with the final tallied scores. Results: Two case studies serve to illustrate the application of this method. The Kendall covariance coefficient is employed to assess the data quality from the judges as a unified entity, whereas the Kendall correlation coefficient is utilized to evaluate the data quality from individual judges. Results show that the data quality of the judge group's scoring is high, while the data quality of the judge group's scoring for the 6th diver, the 5th round, Dive No. 5152B, Judge 5 and 6 in the Competition 1, and the 1st diver, the 3rd round, Dive No. 6245D, Judge 4 in the Competition 2 is inconsistent with the others. Discussion: This approach uncovers disparities in data quality attributed to the judges' panel across each diver, each round, and the various diving maneuvers. However, the Kendall correlation coefficient may not be suitable for evaluating data quality when both the data differences and the sample size are small. Graphical .

Analysis on Objectivity of Scoring of Referee's Evaluation in Cheerleading Competition in University Students Game in Fujian Province

Investigation Analysis on Restricted Factors of Leisure Sports for Senior Students in University in Zhejiang Province

A Comprehensive Evaluation of University Girl Students' Physique

Research on Non-subjective Factor in Subjective Sports Evaluation

Application of Cheerleading Referee Information Management System Based on Data Mining

Survey and Analysis of Basic-level Football Referee's Ability of Controling the Match

Study on the Construction and Demonstration of the Ability Evaluation System of Chinese Basketball Elite Referee

Analysis of Badminton Technical Movement Scoring Rate in International Competitions with the Help of Computer

A study on the assessment and scoring standard of badminton course in colleges and universities: A review

Research on Fairness of Competitive Sports Competition System in Chinese University

Present Situation and Suggestions on the Cultivation of Basketball Referee Ability of Students Majoring in Physical Education in Xinyang Normal University

Multifactor and multidimensional data quality analysis of judge scoring in diving competition

Research of Comprehensive Evaluation on School "Sunshine Sports" Implement

An Improved Evaluation Method for Soccer Player Performance Using Affective Computing

An Analysis of the Situation of Female University Students Participating in Soccer Competition

Analysis of Player's Mental Status during Table Tennis Competition Based on Variation of Score

Analyzing the Technical and Tactical Rationality of Chinese Team in 2015 Women Curling World Championships

Research on the Measurement of College Students’ Basketball Ability and Performance Based on Fuzzy Evaluation Model

ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCING FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS' COLLEGE ENTRANCE EXAMINATION SCORES

STUDENTS' COMPREHENSIVE ACHIEVEMENT BASED ON FACTOR ANALYSIS AND CLUSTERING ANALYSIS

Failure to the Curling Shot and Analysis on the Rationality of Curling Tactics