The Subjective and Objective Analysis of National Student Physical Health Standard

Zhang Zong-guo
Abstract:Taking 500 students from 5 universities in Guangdong Province and 60 students in Huizhou University as research subjects,and put them through the questionnaires and experiments to explore the impact of the results about "National Student Physical Health Standard".Through which,1.The subjective factors:1) The warming-up factors:The experimental result shows that measurement of the vital capacity index,grip strength index,standing jump,sidestep index are:52.00±12.60、60.85±14.08、186.48±37.26 cm、68.85±14.08 after warming-up.It compared with the warming-up before the measured results prominently increased(P≤0.01) .2) The test sequence factors:In the artificial control of the test sequence.The spirometry result is the lowest,which is 2 430.08 ± 660.58ml in the test sequence of sidestep test-vital capacity-grip strength-standing jump-height-weight.The Standing jump is the worst results,which is 171.80 ± 37.86cm in the test sequence of "sidestep test-standing jump-grip strength-vital capacity-height-weight",two results and the other three controls the order of the measurement results were compared with significant difference(P≤0.05) .Height,weight,grip strength and the experimental results at different steps of the test sequence comparison show no significant difference.3) The test attitudes and the cognitive level factors:The result shows that only 56.2% of the students are attach importance to the annual physical fitness tests,about 70% of the students are not concerned about the test requirements and methods and about half of the students are relatively weak on the health awareness.2.The objective factors:The scientific and precision of the apparatus designed,the larger changes of the environment temperature test,the timing difference of the time test,the similarities and differences between test items selected and so on,all has impacted on the testing achievement and grade.Based on the above conclusions,suggestions for evaluating the rationalization of rating about the test results are put forwarded.
Medicine,Psychology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?