The power-extraction regime of a figure-eight trajectory flapping-foil turbine

Min Zheng,Huimin Yao,Yalei Bai,Qin Bo,Xu Chi,Jinyan Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0186792

IF: 4.6

2024-02-01

Physics of Fluids

Abstract:At specified Reynolds numbers Re=ρvc/μ=5×105, this study investigates the power-extraction regime of a flapping-foil turbine executing a figure-eight trajectory. This study thoroughly explored the impacts of trajectory shape, heave and pitch amplitudes, phase difference, and pitch axis location on the power-extraction regime of a flapping turbine. A figure-eight trajectory substantially bolsters the energy harvesting capacity, achieving a peak efficiency of up to 50%. This trajectory capitalizes on the energy generated from the drag encountered by the flapping foil, thereby marking a significant efficiency breakthrough. This could denote a considerable progression for flapping foils tailored for heave and pitch motions since the free stream can be optimally harnessed by the trajectory we have established. In scenarios where the flapping foil undergoes the same maximum effective angle of attack, a wake diffusion spectrum aligns with the Betz limit threshold. Crucially, the closeness to this efficiency frontier suggests a universal maximum effective angle of attack—a consistent law that remains valid for the conventional flapping turbine design. It implies that selections for stroke and pitch amplitudes should be methodical rather than arbitrary. In addition, the positioning of the pitch axis ought to be modified in tandem with phase difference adjustments to bolster the synchronization between heaving motions and resultant lift. The ideal phase difference is variable, contingent on pitch amplitude and pitch axis position. Even with low pitch amplitudes, fine-tuning the phase difference guarantees that the energy harvesting efficiency does not fall below 30%. Such an enhancement would significantly broaden the operational envelope and the parameter space for flapping turbines.

mechanics,physics, fluids & plasmas

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to study the energy extraction mechanism of a flapping - wing turbine performing a figure - eight trajectory under the condition of a specific Reynolds number (Re = 5 × 10^5). Specifically, the research focuses on the influence of the trajectory shape, heave and pitch amplitudes, phase difference, and pitch - axis position on the energy extraction efficiency of the flapping - wing turbine. It is found that the figure - eight trajectory significantly improves the energy - harvesting capacity, with a maximum efficiency of up to 50%. This trajectory utilizes the energy generated by the resistance encountered by the flapping wing, thus achieving a significant breakthrough in efficiency.

### Research Background
Flapping - wing systems have become a research hotspot in recent years, especially the phenomena such as insect flight, fish swimming, and harmonious flapping of airfoils observed in nature. These motion patterns not only help to propel objects but also have the potential for energy harvesting. Compared with traditional windmill or waterwheel designs, flapping - wing energy - harvesting devices have the advantages of being environmentally friendly, easy to deploy, and low - noise. However, the energy - harvesting efficiency of flapping wings has not been able to reach the Betz limit, indicating that new methods need to be adopted to improve efficiency.

### Research Objectives
The main objectives of this research are to explore the energy extraction mechanism of flapping wings with a figure - eight trajectory and analyze the law of efficiency change. Specific research contents include:
1. **Trajectory Shape**: Study the influence of different figure - eight trajectories on energy extraction efficiency.
2. **Heave and Pitch Amplitudes**: Explore how changes in heave and pitch amplitudes affect energy extraction efficiency.
3. **Phase Difference**: Analyze the influence of the phase difference between heave and pitch motions on energy extraction efficiency.
4. **Pitch - Axis Position**: Study the influence of changes in pitch - axis position on energy extraction efficiency.

### Main Findings
1. **Influence of Trajectory Shape**: The figure - eight trajectory significantly improves the energy - harvesting capacity, with a maximum efficiency of up to 50%. This trajectory utilizes the energy generated by the resistance encountered by the flapping wing.
2. **Influence of Heave and Pitch Amplitudes**: As the phase difference increases, the optimal pitch amplitude of the flapping wing gradually increases, and the maximum efficiency also gradually increases. When the phase difference is between 90° and 180°, the optimal pitch amplitude gradually decreases, and the maximum efficiency also gradually decreases.
3. **Influence of Phase Difference**: The optimal phase difference is 90°, and at this time, the efficiency change characteristics are mirror - symmetric with respect to 90°. Different phase differences lead to different energy - harvesting characteristics of the flapping wing.
4. **Influence of Pitch - Axis Position**: Changes in the pitch - axis position will affect the energy - harvesting efficiency of the flapping wing, and the optimal pitch - axis position depends on the phase difference and pitch amplitude.

### Conclusion
This research shows that flapping wings with a figure - eight trajectory can significantly improve energy - harvesting efficiency under specific Reynolds number conditions, up to a maximum of 50%. This finding provides new ideas for the design of flapping wings, especially in optimizing heave and pitch motion parameters. In addition, the research also reveals that there is an optimal effective angle - of - attack amplitude that can maximize energy - harvesting efficiency.