Segmenting hypothalamic subunits in human newborn magnetic resonance imaging data

Jerod M. Rasmussen,Yun Wang,Alice M. Graham,Damien A. Fair,Jonathan Posner,Thomas G. O'Connor,Hyagriv N. Simhan,Elizabeth Yen,Neel Madan,Sonja Entringer,Pathik D. Wadhwa,Claudia Buss,program collaborators for Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26582
IF: 4.8
2024-02-01
Human Brain Mapping
Abstract:Preclinical evidence suggests that inter‐individual variation in the structure of the hypothalamus at birth is associated with variation in the intrauterine environment, with downstream implications for future disease susceptibility. This work describes a novel pipeline for the segmentation of hypothalamic subunits within the human newborn brain. Preclinical evidence suggests that inter‐individual variation in the structure of the hypothalamus at birth is associated with variation in the intrauterine environment, with downstream implications for future disease susceptibility. However, scientific advancement in humans is limited by a lack of validated methods for the automatic segmentation of the newborn hypothalamus. N = 215 healthy full‐term infants with paired T1‐/T2‐weighted MR images across four sites were considered for primary analyses (mean postmenstrual age = 44.3 ± 3.5 weeks, nmale/nfemale = 110/106). The outputs of FreeSurfer's hypothalamic subunit segmentation tools designed for adults (segFS) were compared against those of a novel registration‐based pipeline developed here (segATLAS) and against manually edited segmentations (segMAN) as reference. Comparisons were made using Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSCs) and through expected associations with postmenstrual age at scan. In addition, we aimed to demonstrate the validity of the segATLAS pipeline by testing for the stability of inter‐individual variation in hypothalamic volume across the first year of life (n = 41 longitudinal datasets available). SegFS and segATLAS segmentations demonstrated a wide spread in agreement (mean DSC = 0.65 ± 0.14 SD; range = {0.03–0.80}). SegATLAS volumes were more highly correlated with postmenstrual age at scan than segFS volumes (n = 215 infants; RsegATLAS2 = 65% vs. RsegFS2 = 40%), and segATLAS volumes demonstrated a higher degree of agreement with segMAN reference segmentations at the whole hypothalamus (segATLAS DSC = 0.89 ± 0.06 SD; segFS DSC = 0.68 ± 0.14 SD) and subunit levels (segATLAS DSC = 0.80 ± 0.16 SD; segFS DSC = 0.40 ± 0.26 SD). In addition, segATLAS (but not segFS) volumes demonstrated stability from near birth to ~1 years age (n = 41; R2 = 25%; p
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,neurosciences,neuroimaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?