Abstract:Background: The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) has been on the rise annually. Despite receiving regular sequential anticoagulation therapy, some patients with non-high-risk acute PE (APE) continue to experience residual pulmonary vascular obstruction (RPVO). This study sought to identify the risk factors for RPVO following 3 months of sequential anticoagulation therapy for non-high-risk PE. Machine learning techniques were utilized to construct a clinical prediction model for predicting the occurrence of RPVO. Methods: A total of 254 acute non-high-risk PE patients were included in this study, all of whom were admitted to the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province between 2020 and 2023. After 3 months of regular anticoagulant treatment, computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) were reviewed to identify the presence of RPVO. Patients were then categorized into either the thrombolysis group or the thrombosis residue group. Throughout the study period, 49 patients were excluded due to missing data, irregular treatment, or loss to follow-up. Clinical symptoms, physical signs, and laboratory results of 205 PE patients were recorded. Correlation and collinearity analyses were conducted on relevant risk factors, and significance tests were performed. Heat maps illustrating the relationships between influencing factors were generated. Predictors were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to create a predictive model. Internal validation of the model was also carried out. Results: By searching the literature to understand all the clinical indicators that may affect the efficacy of anticoagulation therapy. A total of 205 patients with non-high-risk acute pulmonary thromboembolism were evaluated for various risk factors. Five independent factors were identified by multivariable analysis-age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acratia, pulmonary systolic blood pressure (PASP), and major arterial embolism-and their P value, odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) were as follows: (P=0.012, OR =1.123; 95% CI: 1.026-1.23), (P=0.002, OR =13.30; 95% CI: 2.673-66.188), (P=0.001, OR =14.009; 95% CI: 2.782-70.547), (P=0.003, OR =1.061; 95% CI: 1.020-1.103) and (P<0.001, OR =18.128; 95% CI: 3.853-85.293), which may indicate a poor prognosis after standard anticoagulant therapy. A nomogram was constructed using these variables and internally validated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96) for the training set and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95) for the validation set. Calibration curves were utilized to assess the practicality of the nomogram. Conclusions: A novel predictive model was developed based on a single-center retrospective study to identify patients with RPVO following anticoagulant therapy for acute non-high-risk PE. This model may aid in the early detection of patients, prompt adjustment of treatment, and ultimately lead to a decrease in adverse outcomes.

Assessment of the Bova score for risk stratification of acute normotensive pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis

[The Impact of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on the Clinical Outcome of Normotensive Patients with Pulmonary Embolism].

White Smoke in the Intermediate risk PE debate, could POPE be the solution?

Evaluation of Four Validated Risk Scores to Predict Outcomes in Hispanic Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Cardiovascular comorbidities and risk stratification in normotensive acute pulmonary embolism patients with right ventricular dysfunction and normal cardiac troponin: insights from a regional registry

Development and validation of a novel risk assessment model to estimate the probability of pulmonary embolism in postoperative patients

Performance of the Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index in Predicting 30-Day Mortality after Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Validation from a Large-Scale Cohort.

Composite Pulmonary Embolism Shock Score and Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism

Identification of hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism at high risk for death: external validation of different models

Optimal hemodynamic parameters for risk stratification in acute pulmonary embolism patients

Low Stroke Volume Predicts Deterioration in Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Prospective Study

[Predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary embolism and the predictive value of the simplified pulmonary embolism severity index]

A novel prognostic prediction indicator in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: Naples prognostic score

Establishing a risk prediction model for residual pulmonary vascular obstruction after regular anticoagulant therapy for non-high-risk pulmonary embolism

Risk stratification of elderly patients with acute pulmonary embolism

PERFORM: Pulmonary Embolism Risk Score for Mortality in Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography-Confirmed Patients

Predictors of mid-term prognosis and adverse factors in acute pulmonary embolism.

Utilization of a Novel Scoring System in Predicting 30-day Mortality in Acute Pulmonary Embolism, the CLOT-5 Pilot Study

Comparison of Qanadli score with conventional risk stratifiers in non-massive pulmonary emboli

Pulmonary embolism: a practical approach to update risk stratification and treatment decisions based on the guidelines

Risk Stratification and Management of Intermediate-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism