(171) The Effects of Pretreatment with Xiaflex on Penile Curvature Correction with Manual Modeling During and After IPP placement

B Atwater,M Rezaee,M Gross,T Alvermann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.162
2024-02-07
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Abstract:Introduction There are a variety of treatment modalities available to treat Peyronie's disease (PD), including collagenase clostridium histolyticum (Xiaflex) injections. Patients with concomitant erectile dysfunction (ED) and PD are best served by insertion of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) in order to adequately treat both conditions. Many PD patients may undergo other PD treatments, including Xiaflex, prior to IPP implantation. There are multiple methods of curvature treatment during IPP surgery, and manual modeling is the predominant method in our practice. Little data exists regarding whether Xiaflex treatments prior to IPP placement influence changes in penile curvature during and after IPP surgery with manual modeling. Objective The primary objectives were assessing the impact of pre-treatment with Xiaflex on penile curvature immediately after IPP implantation and after manual modeling. The secondary objective was change in penile curvature post-operatively. Methods All IPP patients with known preoperative penile curvature with and without a history of Xiaflex injections undergoing IPP placement by a single surgeon from January 2017 to June 2023 were included in this IRB-approved (IRB 00031589) retrospective series. All patients had a 3-piece Coloplast Titan Touch IPP (Coloplast, Minneapolis, MN, USA) ranging 16-24cm in length (mean 19.8 ± 1.9cm) with 0-3cm rear tips (mean 1.4 ± 0.9cm). Goniometer was used to assess curvature during preoperative intracavernosal injection and duplex Doppler ultrasound, at multiple points intraoperatively, and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months. Biplanar curvatures were recorded as primary and secondary values. SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY, UA) was used for statistical analyses, which included t-tests, chi-squared tests, and ANOVA. Results Sixty-one patients were included. Preoperative curvature was 35° ± 17° (10° to 70°) for the Xiaflex cohort (n=11) and 41° ± 15° (20° to 80°) for the Xiaflex naïve cohort (n=50). At the time of IPP placement, patients previously treated with Xiaflex had a 19° ± 12° absolute reduction in primary penile curvatures, corresponding to a 45% ± 36% improvement (25° reduction to 5° worsening), while Xiaflex naïve patients had a 20° ± 13° absolute reduction and 54% ± 23% improvement (50° reduction to no change). Similar mean curvature reductions were seen with IPP placement in primary dorsal curves in the Xiaflex cohort (n=7, 21° ± 4°, 51% ± 12%, 25° to 15° reduction) and Xiaflex naïve cohort (n=24, 21° ± 9°, 51% ± 22%, 40° to 5° reduction). There was little difference in change in curvature after modeling between the Xiaflex (11° ± 3°, 63% ± 23%, 15° to 5° reduction) and Xiaflex naïve patients (14° ± 9°, 70% ± 20%, 40° reduction to 5° worsening). Interval assessments postoperatively were also comparable. Sample size precluded assessment of statistical significance among groups. Conclusions Preoperative treatment of PD with Xiaflex does not impede nor significantly improve curvature correction with IPP implantation and manual modeling. Similar changes in penile curvatures were seen in both groups regardless of curvature direction, modeling, or postoperative interval. In patients with severe PD, Xiaflex may be a useful tool to improve preoperative penile curvatures such that they may be more easily correctable with an IPP. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast, MenMD.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper mainly explores the impact of using Xiaflex (a drug for treating Peyronie's disease) on correcting penile curvature prior to the implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Specifically, the main objectives of the study were to evaluate: 1. **The immediate impact of preoperative Xiaflex use on penile curvature**: that is, to measure the change in penile curvature immediately after IPP implantation. 2. **The change in penile curvature after intraoperative manual shaping**: that is, the change in penile curvature after manual shaping during the IPP implantation process. 3. **The change in penile curvature during the postoperative follow - up period**: that is, the change in penile curvature at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months after the operation. ### Research background Peyronie's disease (PD) is a disease that causes penile curvature, and erectile dysfunction (ED) is often concurrent with PD. For patients with both diseases, IPP implantation is an effective treatment method. However, many patients have received other PD treatments, such as Xiaflex injections, before IPP implantation. Currently, there is very limited data on whether Xiaflex treatment affects the penile curvature correction effect during and after IPP surgery. ### Research methods The study included patients who received IPP implantation from the same surgeon between January 2017 and June 2023. These patients were known to have penile curvature preoperatively, and some patients had a history of Xiaflex injection, while some did not. All patients used the Coloplast Titan Touch IPP, with a length range of 16 - 24 cm and an average length of 19.8 ± 1.9 cm, and a posterior tip length of 0 - 3 cm and an average length of 1.4 ± 0.9 cm. A protractor was used to measure the penile curvature angle before the operation, at multiple time points during the operation, and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months after the operation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, including t - tests, chi - square tests, and ANOVA. ### Main results - **Preoperative curvature angles**: - Xiaflex group: 35° ± 17° (range 10° to 70°) - Non - Xiaflex group: 41° ± 15° (range 20° to 80°) - **Immediate curvature change after IPP implantation**: - Xiaflex group: Absolute reduction of 19° ± 12°, relative improvement of 45% ± 36% (reduction of 25° to worsening of 5°) - Non - Xiaflex group: Absolute reduction of 20° ± 13°, relative improvement of 54% ± 23% (reduction of 50° to no change) - **Curvature change after intraoperative manual shaping**: - Xiaflex group: 11° ± 3°, relative improvement of 63% ± 23% (reduction of 15° to 5°) - Non - Xiaflex group: 14° ± 9°, relative improvement of 70% ± 20% (reduction of 40° to worsening of 5°) - **Curvature change during the postoperative follow - up period**: - The changes between the two groups were similar, and the sample size limited the assessment of statistical significance. ### Conclusion Preoperative Xiaflex treatment for PD does not significantly affect the penile curvature correction effect after IPP implantation and manual shaping. Regardless of the curvature direction, shaping method, or postoperative follow - up time, the penile curvature changes in the two groups of patients were similar. However, for patients with severe PD, Xiaflex may be a useful tool to improve penile curvature preoperatively, making it easier to correct with IPP.