Abstract:The ‘reintegrative shaming’ and ‘benevolent paternalism’ models, traditionally used to describe the Japanese criminal justice system, have been periodically criticised for their orientalist approach. Nevertheless, no critique addressed the fact that these models ignored the presence of long-lasting crime syndicates, the yakuza, in Japan. Meanwhile, since 1991 the Japanese government has passed different sets of anti-yakuza countermeasures, increasingly punitive towards members and ex-members of the criminal group, that transferred more policing and surveillance duties to common citizens. In light of the evolution of anti-yakuza countermeasures in the past 25 years, this article argues that an analysis of these laws and regulations can provide a chance to reappraise the ‘reintegrative shaming/benevolent paternalism’ models, and proposes ‘shaming paternalism’ as a more realistic description of the current Japanese criminal justice system. According to this model, criminals are shamed and struggle to reintegrate, and the state’s intrusiveness is operated at various stages. Given the gap in English-speaking literature regarding this topic, firstly the contents of anti-yakuza countermeasures are outlined, followed by an evaluation of their effects on the yakuza population. The levels of reintegration of ex-yakuza members are considered, corroborating the hypothesis that the contemporary Japanese criminal justice system is not focussed on reintegration: actually, the most recent tendencies show an increase in punitiveness and stigmatisation. The paper argues that this trend can be understood as an index of increasing authoritarianism in the Japanese government, and concludes that civil engagement is the only viable option of resistance.

Idealizing the other? Western images of the Japanese Criminal Justice System

Hostage Justice and Wrongful Convictions in Japan

Japanese Atmospheres of Criminal Justice

Crime and criminal justice in modern Japan: From re-integrative shaming to popular punitivism

Myths of restorative features in the Japanese justice system and society: the role of apology, compensation and confession, and application of reintegrative shaming

The rise of shaming paternalism in Japan: recent tendencies in the Japanese criminal justice system

The politics of increasing punitiveness and the rising populism in Japanese criminal justice policy

Japanese Suspect Interviews, Confessions, and Related Factors

Applications of Legal Psychology in Japan: Current Practice, Research Knowledge, and Future Directions

Lay Participation in Japanese Criminal Justice: Prosecution Review Commissions, the Lay-Judge System, and Penal Institution Visiting Committees

Recent Trends in the Execution of Sentences and the Involvement of Victims in Japan

On the Notion,Enforcement and Reform of Japanese“Inquest of Prosecution System”

Revealing the Introspection Responsibility for the Offence from Japanese National Culture Psychology

On Indictment-only Doctrine in Criminal Procedure of Japan

Deconstructing Japan’s PR

Protecting the Script of the Japanese Criminal Justice System

The Development of Japan's Criminal Law and Its Inspirations

The Leniency on Acknowledgment of Guilt and Acceptance of Punishment in Inquisitorial System: Taking Criminal Justice Theory and Practice in Mainland China and Germany as Clues

On the System of "Appropriate Adult" Presenting at the Scene of Interrogation--Focusing on the juvenile suspects

A place for public concerns in parole decision making in Japan