Abstract WP244: Myocardial Infarction Risk Following Stroke and Cervical Artery Dissection: Multi-State Inpatient Sample Analysis

Lukas Strelecky,Liqi Shu,Setareh Salehi Omran,Eric Goldstein,Thanh Nguyen,James E Siegler,Farhan Khan,Christoph Stretz,Karen L Furie,Shadi Yaghi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.wp244
IF: 10.17
2024-02-03
Stroke
Abstract:Stroke, Volume 55, Issue Suppl_1, Page AWP244-AWP244, February 1, 2024. Introduction:Cervical artery dissection (CAD) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are key health challenges. We utilized a multi-state database to examine myocardial infarction (MI) risk post stroke or CAD to estimate cardiovascular complication risk.Method:We analyzed State Inpatient Database from New York (2011-2017) and Florida (2011-2019). Adult patients with no head or neck trauma were separated into 4 groups based on diagnoses of AIS, CAD, concurrent AIS and CAD, or a reference group of transient ischemic attack, transient global amnesia, or migraine. Diagnosis identification was based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 CM codes. One-year MI risk was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, parametric accelerated failure time survival analysis, and additional Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) analysis.Results:827,761 patients were included (mean age 62.7 years, 61.58% female). Among all patients, 19,755 (2.39%) had MI within one-year: 1.4% of the reference group, 3.4% of the AIS group, 1.5% of the CAD group, and 1.8% of concurrent AIS and CAD group. Compared to the reference group, patients with AIS alone and patients with concurrent CAD and AIS had higher MI risk (hazard ratio [HR] 4.91, 95% CI 4.63-5.21, P < 0.001; HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.02-2.73, P = 0.04, respectively), while patients with CAD alone had no elevated risk (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.66-2.06, P = 0.60) (Figure). After IPTW adjustment for age, diabetes, heart failure, coronary artery disease and hyperlipidemia, patients with AIS alone still had the highest risk for MI (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.87, 95% CI 1.75-1.99, P < 0.001), followed by patients with concurrent CAD and AIS (aHR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05-1.5, P = 0.012), while patients with CAD had nonsignificant risk (aHR 1.142, 95% CI 0.82-1.58, P = 0.42).Conclusion:This analysis reveals stroke patients are nearly two-fold more likely to have subsequent MI compared to those with CAD. These findings merit validation and may impact clinical evaluation and patient care.
peripheral vascular disease,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?