Abstract:Background: Isolated abdominal aortic dissection (IAAD) is a rare entity with poorly defined risk factors and wide variation in management. We set forth to compare patient characteristics, management, and outcomes of uncomplicated isolated abdominal aortic dissection (uIAAD) versus high risk and complicated isolated abdominal aortic dissection (hrcIAAD) to investigate whether these categories can be utilized to guide IAAD management and provide risk stratification for intervention. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients with spontaneous IAAD at a tertiary health care system between 1996 and 2022. Demographics, comorbidities, factors relating to initial presentation including imaging findings, and dissection outcomes including long-term all-cause mortality and aortic-related mortality from time of dissection to final available record were abstracted. IAAD demonstrating rupture or malperfusion were designated as complicated, those with aortic diameter greater than 4 cm on presentation or refractory pain were designated as high risk, and the remainder was designated as uIAAD. All variables were compared between hrcIAAD and uIAAD using Fisher's exact test, unpaired t-test, and Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate. Results: Over the study period, 74 patients presented with spontaneous IAAD (mean age 60 ± 16 years, 61% male) with postdissection follow-up records to an average of 6.8 ± 5.8 years. Of these, 76% presented with uIAAD versus 24% with hrcIAAD. hrcIAAD was diagnosed at a significantly younger age on average than uIAAD (52 ± 14 vs. 62 ± 16 years, P = 0.02), was less likely to present with concomitant hyperlipidemia (0% vs. 41%, P < 0.01), coronary artery disease (6% vs. 47%, P < 0.01), and prior smoking history (39% vs. 72%). hrcIAAD was more likely to present in patients with a genetic aortopathy (27% vs. 7%, P = 0.03). Hypertension was not significantly different between groups. Patients with hrcIAAD were significantly more likely to present with extension into iliac arteries compared to uIAAD (61% vs. 18%, P < 0.01). A much higher proportion of hrcIAAD required hospitalization compared to uIAAD (83% vs. 30%, P < 0.01) and operative intervention (67% vs. 7%, P < 0.01). While there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between groups, there was a significant difference between aortic-related mortality which only occurred in those with hrcIAAD (28% vs. 0%, P < 0.01). Conclusions: Comparison of long-term outcomes suggests that hrcIAAD is associated with increased hospitalization and need for operative intervention compared to uIAAD. Significant differences in atherosclerotic risk factors and proportions of connective tissue disease history between patients who present with hrcIAAD and uIAAD suggest that differences in underlying etiology are largely responsible for whether IAAD progresses towards rupture or has a more benign course and should be considered in risk stratification to guide more specific and targeted management of IAAD.

Abstract TP173: Differential Outcomes and Treatment in Vertebral versus Carotid Artery Dissections: A National Inpatient Sample Study

Differential Outcomes and Treatment in Non-traumatic Carotid versus Vertebral Cervical Artery Dissection: A National Inpatient Sample Study

Clinical analysis of cervical artery dissection in fifteen patients

Clinical Analysis of Cerebral Artery Dissection

Predisposing Factors and Radiological Features in Patients with Internal Carotid Artery Dissection or Vertebral Artery Dissection

Are There Differences between Traumatic and Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissections?

Outcome Differences Between Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) and Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) in Postoperative Ventricular Arrhythmia, Neurological Complications, and In-Hospital Mortality

Abstract 100: Impact of Dissection Location on Subsequent Stroke Risk: A Nationwide Analysis

Cervicocranial Arterial Dissection: an Analysis of the Clinical Features, Prognosis, and Treatment Efficacy.

Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Imaging Features of Craniocervical Artery Dissection: Spontaneous CAD vs. Minor Traumatic CAD

Abstract TP172: Rising Trends in Cervical Artery Dissection Admissions: A Nationwide Study From 2005 to 2019

Outcome of Cervicocranial Artery Dissection with Different Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Toward Individual Treatment in Cervical Artery Dissection: Subgroup Analysis of the TREAT‐CAD Randomized Trial

Individual participant data analysis comparing acute stroke patients with anterior versus posterior circulation dissections

Comparative outcomes of surgical and conservative management in carotid artery dissection

Effect of Asymptomatic Common Carotid Artery Dissection on the Prognosis of Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Carotid Artery Dissection Without Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients With Cerebral Ischemia Presentation

Abstract WMP9: Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Treatment Outcomes in Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes: Intracranial Atherosclerotic vs. Non- Intracranial Atherosclerotic Occlusions

Comparison of Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes of Concurrent Carotid Artery Revascularization and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: The United States Experience 2004 to 2012

Abstract WP208: Infarction Size Affects Clinical Outcomes in Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting With Mechanical Thrombectomy

Complicated and Uncomplicated Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissections Demonstrate Different Patient Characteristics and Outcomes