Abstract:Research and experience show that decisions in the early stages of the whole product life cycle, which means conceptual decision of a product's Life Cycle Scenario (LCS), play an important role in the Life Cycle Cost (LCC), performance, reliability, and environmental impact. This paper describes how to generate and evaluate product life cycle scenarios. The Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) method is employed because it has the ability to structure complex and multi-attribute problem hierarchically and can deal with the problem of inconsistency in decision-making during pairwise comparison and weighting. First product life cycle scenarios are generated by combination of different life cycle attributes. Then the hierarchy structure of AHP is formulated and essential criteria for evaluating life cycle scenarios are identified. After that pairwise comparison matrices with each criterion and sub-criteria are generated and weights for each criterion are determined. Finally the preferred solution can be selected after comprehensive evaluation. An example demonstrates the application of this methodology. therefore, imperative to inject environmental issues and service quality into life cycle scenario design and to develop useful methods for designers to use. Even from the early 1980s, different methods such as design for assembly, design for manufacturing have been developed, but most of these methods are only applicable in the detailed design stage, in which modification cannot compensate for a poor design concept formulated at the conceptual design stage, and then cannot support generation and evaluation of life cycle scenarios. Because knowledge of design requirements and constraints during this early stage of a product's life cycle is usually imprecise and incomplete, methods that have abilities to structure complex, multi-person, multi-attribute problems hierarchically are of great help in evaluating and selecting product life cycle scenarios. In manufacturing and other engineering fields, many researchers often use decision theory for scientific approaches to evaluation based selection problems. Different decision theory methods have been studied, including Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) (Wang, 2002),

Selecting a variety of futures for scenario development

Scenario generation by selection from historical data

Generation and Evaluation of Product Life Cycle Scenarios in Conceptual Design

Scenario-based decision-making for power systems investment planning

A Novel Method for Multistage Scenario Generation Based on Cluster Analysis.

Fast Empirical Scenarios

Scenario Planning: Toward a More Complete Model for Practice

Efficient Scenario Generation for Heavy-tailed Chance Constrained Optimization

A General, Analytic Method for Generating Robust Strategies and Narrative Scenarios

Knowledge-Based Scenario Tree Generation Methods and Application in Multiperiod Portfolio Selection Problem

Acquire Driving Scenarios Efficiently: A Framework for Prospective Assessment of Cost-Optimal Scenario Acquisition

Optimized Scenario Reduction: Solving Large-Scale Stochastic Programs with Quality Guarantees

Scenario Reduction Algorithms in Stochastic Programming

A quantitative approach to choose among multiple mutually exclusive decisions: comparative expected utility theory

THE EFFECTS OF SCENARIOS ON DECISION-MAKING QUALITY IN EARLY DESIGN – AN EMPIRICAL STUDY

The Scenario Generation Algorithm for Multistage Stochastic Linear Programming

The value of experiments in futures and foresight science as illustrated by the case of scenario planning

Consistent Calibration of Economic Scenario Generators: The Case for Conditional Simulation

Building technology foresight: using scenarios to embrace innovation

Non-convex scenario optimization