Abstract:Integrating diverse disciplines and knowledge practices into conservation offers new insights into the complex socioecological dynamics of conservation challenges and how to address them. Integration, however, is not simple; disciplines differ widely in their epistemic and professional commitments, theories, methods, applications, practices, and codes of ethics. Using an epistemic justice approach, we examined how and why different forms of disciplinary and social diversity are connected and offer a framework for promoting disciplinary diversity for conservation science and practice. This framework draws on a literature review and open‐ended responses from surveys of Society for Conservation Biology (SCB) members (n = 577) and nonmembers (n = 213) on experiences of professional and disciplinary exclusion and inclusion collected by SCB's Disciplinary Inclusion Task Force. We propose 4 steps conservation organizations and projects can take to promote disciplinary diversity and inclusion: know your history; understand power dynamics; listen to underrepresented voices; and operationalize disciplinary diversity and inclusion. As members of a highly interdisciplinary and diverse task force, we illustrated this framework through reflections on our shared experiences working together and the challenges and opportunities we faced. Un marco para promover la diversidad disciplinaria y la inclusión por medio de la justicia epistémica Resumen La integración de diversas disciplinas y prácticas de conocimiento en la conservación ofrece nuevas perspectivas sobre la compleja dinámica socioecológica de los retos de la conservación y sobre cómo abordarlos. Sin embargo, la integración no es sencilla; las disciplinas difieren ampliamente en sus compromisos epistémicos y profesionales, teorías, métodos, aplicaciones, prácticas y códigos éticos. Usamos un enfoque de justicia epistémica, analizamos cómo y por qué las diferentes formas de diversidad disciplinaria y social están conectadas y ofrecemos un marco para promover la diversidad disciplinaria para la ciencia y la práctica de la conservación. Este marco se basa en una revisión bibliográfica y en las respuestas abiertas de las encuestas realizadas a los miembros de la Sociedad de Biología de la Conservación (SCB) (n = 577) y a los no miembros (n = 213) sobre las experiencias de exclusión e inclusión profesional y disciplinaria recogidas por el Grupo de Trabajo de Inclusión Disciplinaria de la SCB. Proponemos cuatro pasos que las organizaciones y los proyectos de conservación pueden dar para promover la diversidad disciplinaria y la inclusión: conocer su historia; comprender la dinámica del poder; escuchar las voces subrepresentadas; y poner en práctica la diversidad disciplinaria y la inclusión. Como miembros de un grupo de trabajo altamente interdisciplinar y diverso, ilustramos este marco a través de reflexiones sobre nuestras experiencias compartidas trabajando juntos y los retos y oportunidades a los que nos enfrentamos. 通过认识论正义促进学科多样性和包容性的框架【摘要】将不同学科和知识实践整合到保护工作中, 可以让我们对保护工作面临的复杂社会生态动态以及如何应对这些挑战产生新的认识。然而, 这一整合并不简单, 因为各学科在认识论和职业承诺、理论、方法、应用、实践和道德准则方面都存在很大差异。本研究采用认识论正义的方法, 分析了不同形式的学科和社会多样性之间的联系及其原因, 并为促进保护科学与实践的学科多样性提供了一个框架。这一框架是基于文献综述以及对保护生物学会成员(577人)和非成员(213人)关于专业和学科排斥与包容经历调查的开放式回答构建的, 调查由保护生物学会的学科包容工作组收集。我们提出了保护组织和项目为促进学科多样性和包容性可采取的四个步骤:了解学科历史, 理解权力动态, 倾听未被充分代表的声音, 开始实现学科多样性和包容性。作为一个学科高度交叉和多元化的特别工作组的成员, 我们通过反思我们共同的工作经历以及我们所面临的挑战和机遇来说明这一框架。【翻译: 胡怡思; 审校: 聂永刚】

Supporting inclusive scientific communities: Insights from the ATBC society survey

Enhancing disciplinary diversity and inclusion in conservation science and practice based on a case study of the Society for Conservation Biology

Global South leadership towards inclusive tropical ecology and conservation

Expanding the landscape of opportunity: Professional societies support early-career researchers through community programming and peer coaching.

Overcoming the Tropical Andes publication divide: Insights from local researchers on challenges and solutions

Insights from Two Decades of the Student Conference on Conservation Science

Beyond barriers, towards diversity: how hybrid student conferences can drive accessibility

Embracing diversity and inclusivity in an academic setting: Insights from the Organization for Human Brain Mapping

Academic publishing requires linguistically inclusive policies

Is the Spanish Population Pro-Conservation or Pro-Utilitarian towards Threatened Flora? Social Analysis on the Willingness to Protect Biodiversity

Society of Systematic Biologists

A framework for promoting disciplinary diversity and inclusion through epistemic justice

Language Barriers in Organismal Biology: What Can Journals Do Better?

Engaging Scientific Diasporas in STEAM Education: The Case of Science Clubs Colombia

Tropical field stations yield high conservation return on investment

Rising awareness to improve conservation of microorganisms in terrestrial ecosystems: advances and future directions in soil microbial diversity from Chile and the Antarctic Peninsula

SOLATINA: A Latin-American Society for Bee Research to Foster the Interactions Between Scientists and Coordinate Large-Scale Research Programs

The Latin American Society for Developmental Biology: a successful history

Embracing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Scientific Community—Viewpoints of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee of the North American Vascular Biology Organization

Science Needs You: Mobilizing for Diversity in Award Recognition

Contributions of human cultures to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation