Virtual Sensor Array Based on Butterworth–Van Dyke Equivalent Model of QCM for Selective Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds

Dongsheng Li,Zihao Xie,Mengjiao Qu,Qian Zhang,Yongqing Fu,Jin Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c13046
2021-09-21
Abstract:Recently virtual sensor arrays (VSAs) have been developed to improve the selectivity of volatile organic compound (VOC) sensors. However, most reported VSAs rely on detecting single property change of the sensing material after their exposure to VOCs, thus resulting in a loss of much valuable information. In this work, we propose a VSA with the high dimensionality of outputs based on a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) and a sensing layer of MXene. Changes in both mechanical and electrical properties of the MXene film are utilized in the detection of the VOCs. We take the changes of parameters of the Butterworth–van Dyke model for the QCM-based sensor operated at multiple harmonics as the responses of the VSA to various VOCs. The dimensionality of the VSA's responses has been expanded to four independent outputs, and the responses to the VOCs have shown good linearity in multidimensional space. The response and recovery times are 16 and 54 s, respectively. Based on machine learning algorithms, the proposed VSA accurately identifies different VOCs and mixtures, as well as quantifies the targeted VOC in complex backgrounds (with an accuracy of 90.6%). Moreover, we demonstrate the capacity of the VSA to identify "patients with diabetic ketosis" from volunteers with an accuracy of 95%, based on the detection of their exhaled breath. The QCM-based VSA shows great potential for detecting VOC biomarkers in human breath for disease diagnosis.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c13046.Material characterizations and data analysis methods; diagram of the VOC sensing system; SEM image of the nanosheets; basic BVD equivalent circuit model; resistance and reactance spectra of the QCM; multiparameter responses to four types of VOCs; responses to acetone in multiple backgrounds; dynamic response test of the VOC sensor; frequency responses to 100 ppm of four VOCs; PCA scores for PC1 and PC4 from responses to four VOCs; PCA scores from responses to four VOC mixtures; LOOCV results for the identifications of four VOCs and VOC mixtures by multiple methods; error and accuracy in concentration prediction; stability of the sensor; responses of traditional MXene-based sensors; concentrations of mixtures; and comparison for output dimensionality (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?