Refining risk stratification in paediatric B‐acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: Combining IKZF1plus and Day 15 MRD positivity

Hsi‐Che Liu,Ying‐Jung Huang,Tang‐Her Jaing,Kang‐Hsi Wu,Shih‐Hsiang Chen,Shih‐Chung Wang,Ting‐Chi Yeh,Chih‐Cheng Hsiao,Te‐Kau Chang,Hsiu‐Ju Yen,Fang‐Liang Huang,Pei‐Chin Lin,Jen‐Yin Hou,Jiunn‐Ming Sheen,Yu‐Mei Liao,Tsung‐Yen Chang,Yu‐Chieh Chen,Shyh‐Shin Chiou,Chao‐Ping Yang,Ching‐Hon Pui,Der‐Cherng Liang,Lee‐Yung Shih
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19338
2024-03-15
British Journal of Haematology
Abstract:Considering the optimal application of IKZF1 status in the MRD‐guided TPOG‐ALL‐2013 protocol, this study proposes a combination of IKZF1plus, provisional high‐risk and Day 15 MRD positivity. Among patients with Day 15 MRD positivity, the provisional high‐risk patients with IKZF1plus had the most unfavourable outcomes (5‐year EFS, 42.0%; RFS, 48.0%; and OS, 72.7%), compared to provisional standard‐risk patients with IKZF1plus and provisional high‐risk or standard‐risk patients with undeleted‐IKZF1. This targeted approach, rather than testing every paediatric B‐ALL or provisional high‐risk ALL at diagnosis, enables the precise identification of patients with IKZF1plus (comprising 3.1% of Philadelphia‐negative ALL) who are at high risk of relapse. This approach also proves the advantage in avoiding potential overtreatment that may arise from categorizing IKZF1 deletion or IKZF1plus as the high‐risk group at diagnosis. Summary This study investigates the potential utility of IKZF1 deletion as an additional high‐risk marker for paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). The prognostic impact of IKZF1 status, in conjunction with minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD), was evaluated within the MRD‐guided TPOG‐ALL‐2013 protocol using 412 newly diagnosed B‐ALL patients aged 1–18. IKZF1 status was determined using multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification. IKZF1 deletions, when co‐occurring with CDKN2A, CDKN2B, PAX5 or PAR1 region deletions in the absence of ERG deletions, were termed IKZF1plus. Both IKZF1 deletion (14.6%) and IKZF1plus (7.8%) independently predicted poorer outcomes in B‐ALL. IKZF1plus was observed in 4.1% of Philadelphia‐negative ALL, with a significantly lower 5‐year event‐free survival (53.9%) compared to IKZF1 deletion alone (83.8%) and wild‐type IKZF1 (91.3%) (p
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?