Genomic Determinants of Outcome in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Ti-Cheng Chang,Wenan Chen,Chunxu Qu,Zhongshan Cheng,Dale Hedges,Abdelrahman Elsayed,Stanley B Pounds,Mary Shago,Karen R Rabin,Elizabeth A Raetz,Meenakshi Devidas,Cheng Cheng,Anne Angiolillo,Pradyuamna Baviskar,Michael Borowitz,Michael J Burke,Andrew Carroll,William L Carroll,I-Ming Chen,Richard Harvey,Nyla Heerema,Ilaria Iacobucci,Jeremy R Wang,Sima Jeha,Eric Larsen,Leonard Mattano,Kelly Maloney,Ching-Hon Pui,Nilsa C Ramirez,Wanda Salzer,Cheryl Willman,Naomi Winick,Brent Wood,Stephen P Hunger,Gang Wu,Charles G Mullighan,Mignon L Loh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.02238
2024-10-10
Abstract:Purpose: Although cure rates for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) exceed 90%, ALL remains a leading cause of cancer death in children. Half of relapses arise in children initially classified with standard-risk (SR) disease. Materials and methods: To identify genomic determinants of relapse in children with SR ALL, we performed genome and transcriptome sequencing of diagnostic and remission samples of children with SR (n = 1,381) or high-risk B-ALL with favorable cytogenetic features (n = 115) enrolled on Children's Oncology Group trials. We used a case-control study design analyzing 439 patients who relapsed and 1,057 who remained in complete remission for at least 5 years. Results: Genomic subtype was associated with relapse, which occurred in approximately 50% of cases of PAX5-altered ALL (odds ratio [OR], 3.31 [95% CI, 2.17 to 5.03]; P = 3.18 × 10-8). Within high-hyperdiploid ALL, gain of chromosome 10 with disomy of chromosome 7 was associated with favorable outcome (OR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.42]; P = 8.02 × 10-10; St Jude Children's Research Hospital validation cohort: OR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.80]; P = .009), and disomy of chromosomes 10 and 17 with gain of chromosome 6 was associated with relapse (OR, 7.16 [95% CI, 2.63 to 21.51]; P = 2.19 × 10-5; validation cohort: OR, 21.32 [95% CI, 3.62 to 119.30]; P = .0004). Genomic alterations were associated with relapse in a subtype-dependent manner, including alterations of INO80 in ETV6::RUNX1 ALL, IKZF1, and CREBBP in high-hyperdiploid ALL and FHIT in BCR::ABL1-like ALL. Genomic alterations were also associated with the presence of minimal residual disease, including NRAS and CREBBP in high-hyperdiploid ALL. Conclusion: Genetic subtype, patterns of aneuploidy, and secondary genomic alterations determine risk of relapse in childhood ALL. Comprehensive genomic analysis is required for optimal risk stratification.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?