Abstract:Children achieve better long‐term language outcomes than adults. However, it remains unclear whether children actually learn language more quickly than adults during real‐time exposure to input—indicative of true superior language learning abilities—or whether this advantage stems from other factors. To examine this issue, we compared the rate at which children (8–10 years) and adults extracted a novel, hidden linguistic rule, in which novel articles probabilistically predicted the animacy of associated nouns (e.g., "gi lion"). Participants categorized these two‐word phrases according to a second, explicitly instructed rule over two sessions, separated by an overnight delay. Both children and adults successfully learned the hidden animacy rule through mere exposure to the phrases, showing slower response times and decreased accuracy to occasional phrases that violated the rule. Critically, sensitivity to the hidden rule emerged much more quickly in children than adults; children showed a processing cost for violation trials from very early on in learning, whereas adults did not show reliable sensitivity to the rule until the second session. Children also showed superior generalization of the hidden animacy rule when asked to classify nonword trials (e.g., "gi badupi") according to the hidden animacy rule. Children and adults showed similar retention of the hidden rule over the delay period. These results provide insight into the nature of the critical period for language, suggesting that children have a true advantage over adults in the rate of implicit language learning. Relative to adults, children more rapidly extract hidden linguistic structures during real‐time language exposure. Research Highlights Children and adults both succeeded in implicitly learning a novel, uninstructed linguistic rule, based solely on exposure to input. Children learned the novel linguistic rules much more quickly than adults. Children showed better generalization performance than adults when asked to apply the novel rule to nonsense words without semantic content. Results provide insight into the nature of critical period effects in language, indicating that children have an advantage over adults in real‐time language learning.

Can Preschoolers Learn Novel Causal Rules in Pretense?

Causal learning, counterfactual reasoning and pretend play: a cross-cultural comparison of Peruvian, mixed- and low-socioeconomic status U.S. children

How fantasy benefits young children's understanding of pretense

Is young children's recognition of pretense metarepresentational or merely behavioral? Evidence from 2- and 3-year-olds' understanding of pretend sounds and speech

Cortical mechanisms of pretense observation

Do embodiment and fictionality affect young children's learning?

Inferring Unseen Causes: Developmental and Evolutionary Origins

Dramatic pretend play games uniquely improve emotional control in young children

Causal relational problem solving in toddlers

Preschoolers and Adults Learn From Novel Metaphors

Children extract a new linguistic rule more quickly than adults

Don't throw the associative baby out with the Bayesian bathwater: Children are more associative when reasoning retrospectively under information processing demands

Social context effects in 2- and 4-year-olds' selective versus faithful imitation

Promoting Social Pretend Play in Preschool Age: Is Providing Roleplay Material Enough?

A Comparison of the Pretending Elements between Constructive Play and Pretend Play.

Adults' learning of complex explanations violates their intuitions about optimal explanatory order

Teaching Theory of Mind

Generalization of learning from picture books to novel test conditions by 18- and 24-month-old children.

Evaluations of epistemic and practical reasons for belief in a predominantly White U.S. sample of preschoolers

Pretend Play and the Development of Emotion Regulation in Preschool Children

Learning Causal Overhypotheses through Exploration in Children and Computational Models