Abstract:Adaptive interventions, aka dynamic treatment regimens, are sequences of pre-specified decision rules that guide the provision of treatment for an individual given information about their baseline and evolving needs, including in response to prior intervention. Clustered adaptive interventions (cAIs) extend this idea by guiding the provision of intervention at the level of clusters (e.g., clinics), but with the goal of improving outcomes at the level of individuals within the cluster (e.g., clinicians or patients within clinics). A clustered, sequential multiple-assignment randomized trials (cSMARTs) is a multistage, multilevel randomized trial design used to construct high-quality cAIs. In a cSMART, clusters are randomized at multiple intervention decision points; at each decision point, the randomization probability can depend on response to prior data. A challenge in cluster-randomized trials, including cSMARTs, is the deleterious effect of small samples of clusters on statistical inference, particularly via estimation of standard errors. \par This manuscript develops finite-sample adjustment (FSA) methods for making improved statistical inference about the causal effects of cAIs in a cSMART. The paper develops FSA methods that (i) scale variance estimators using a degree-of-freedom adjustment, (ii) reference a t distribution (instead of a normal), and (iii) employ a ``bias corrected" variance estimator. Method (iii) requires extensions that are unique to the analysis of cSMARTs. Extensive simulation experiments are used to test the performance of the methods. The methods are illustrated using the Adaptive School-based Implementation of CBT (ASIC) study, a cSMART designed to construct a cAI for improving the delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) by school mental health professionals within high schools in Michigan.

Approaches to Statistical Efficiency When Comparing the Embedded Adaptive Interventions in a SMART

Efficient and Robust Approaches for Analysis of SMARTs: Illustration using the ADAPT-R Trial

Non-Inferiority and Equivalence Tests in A Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)

Design and analysis considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens with binary outcomes from sequential multiple assignment randomized trials

Comparing cluster-level dynamic treatment regimens using sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials: Regression estimation and sample size considerations

SMART Binary: Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Adaptive Interventions in SMART studies with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes

Optimal Adaptive SMART Designs with Binary Outcomes

Finite-sample adjustments for comparing clustered adaptive interventions using data from a clustered SMART

Sample size estimation for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a SMART: A Monte Carlo-based approach and case study with longitudinal overdispersed count outcomes

Interim monitoring in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials

A novel approach to assess dynamic treatment regimes embedded in a SMART with an ordinal outcome

Incorporating Participants' Welfare into Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials

Interim Monitoring of Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials Using Partial Information

Adaptive Randomization Methods for Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) via Thompson Sampling

Using Pilot Data to Size Observational Studies for the Estimation of Dynamic Treatment Regimes

Incorporating participants’ welfare into sequential multiple assignment randomized trials

Sample size considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial with a continuous longitudinal outcome

Modeling Item-Level Heterogeneous Treatment Effects With the Explanatory Item Response Model: Leveraging Large-Scale Online Assessments to Pinpoint the Impact of Educational Interventions

Adaptive selection of the optimal strategy to improve precision and power in randomized trials

Making SMART decisions in prophylaxis and treatment studies

A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions