Abstract:BACKGROUND:Cluster randomized trials are designed to evaluate interventions at the cluster or group level. When clusters are randomized but some clusters report no or non-analyzable data, intent-to-treat analysis, the gold standard for the analysis of randomized controlled trials, can be compromised. This article presents a very flexible statistical methodology for cluster randomized trials whose outcome is a cluster-level proportion (e.g. proportion from a cluster reporting an event) in the setting where clusters report non-analyzable data (which in general could be due to nonadherence, dropout, missingness, etc.). The approach is motivated by a previously published stratified randomized controlled trial called, "The Randomized Recruitment Intervention Trial (RECRUIT)," designed to examine the effectiveness of a trust-based continuous quality improvement intervention on increasing minority recruitment into clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01911208). METHODS:The novel approach exploits the use of generalized estimating equations for cluster-level reports, such that all clusters randomized at baseline are able to be analyzed, and intervention effects are presented as risk ratios. Simulation studies under different outcome missingness scenarios and a variety of intra-cluster correlations are conducted. A comparative analysis of the method with imputation and per protocol approaches for RECRUIT is presented. RESULTS:Simulation results show the novel approach produces unbiased and efficient estimates of the intervention effect that maintain the nominal type I error rate. Application to RECRUIT shows similar effect sizes when compared to the imputation and per protocol approach. CONCLUSION:The article demonstrates that an innovative bivariate generalized estimating equations framework allows one to implement an intent-to-treat analysis to obtain risk ratios or odds ratios, for a variety of cluster randomized designs.

Comparing cluster-level dynamic treatment regimens using sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials: Regression estimation and sample size considerations

The expression of stat91, ras-independent signal transducer and activator, in human gastric carcinomas.

Design and analysis considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens with binary outcomes from sequential multiple assignment randomized trials

Sample size considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial with a continuous longitudinal outcome

Sample size estimation for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a SMART: A Monte Carlo-based approach and case study with longitudinal overdispersed count outcomes

Linear Mixed Models for Comparing Dynamic Treatment Regimens on a Longitudinal Outcome in Sequentially Randomized Trials

A generalized outcome-adaptive sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design

A novel approach to assess dynamic treatment regimes embedded in a SMART with an ordinal outcome

Efficient and Robust Approaches for Analysis of SMARTs: Illustration using the ADAPT-R Trial

Using Pilot Data to Size Observational Studies for the Estimation of Dynamic Treatment Regimes

A Generalized Logrank-type Test for Comparison of Treatment Regimes in Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials

Interim Monitoring of Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials Using Partial Information

Non-Inferiority and Equivalence Tests in A Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)

Intent-to-treat Analysis of Cluster Randomized Trials when Clusters Report Unidentifiable Outcome Proportions.

Optimal Adaptive SMART Designs with Binary Outcomes

Cluster Randomized Trials with a Pretest and Posttest: Equivalence of Three-, Two- and One-Level Analyses, and Sample Size Calculation

Adaptive Randomization Methods for Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) via Thompson Sampling

SMART Binary: Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Adaptive Interventions in SMART studies with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes

Interim monitoring in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials

Approaches to Statistical Efficiency When Comparing the Embedded Adaptive Interventions in a SMART

New designs for Bayesian adaptive cluster-randomized trials