Abstract:Purpose The International Continence Society and the International Urogynecological Association have not yet standardized the definition of de novo stress urinary incontinence. Recent studies define the development of stress urinary incontinence as occurring after surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse in previously continent women. The mechanisms that cause de novo stress urinary incontinence are not yet clear. Knowledge of the predictive factors for this outcome after surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse would be useful for assessing whether a concomitant anti‐incontinence procedure should be performed. Materials and Methods The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to identify some of the risk factors for de novo stress urinary incontinence: high body mass index, pelvic organ prolapse stage before surgery, presence of occult urinary incontinence, type of surgery, and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The present study was registered in the PROSPERO database under number CRD42021293764, and the systematic review was carried out according to the MOOSE recommendations and with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Results A total of 2429 articles were identified. Nine cohort studies were included in the systematic review and seven in the meta‐analysis. The risk of bias was assessed via the Newcastle–Ottawa scale and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach for each outcome. In the meta‐analysis, associations were identified between de novo stress urinary incontinence and occult urinary incontinence (n: 422; OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.26–3.22; p = 0.004), diabetes (n: 1213; OR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.30–4.26; p = 0.005), and advanced pelvic organ prolapse (n: 1003; OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.14–3.30; p = 0.01). Consulting a meta‐analysis for the type of surgery was deemed impossible. A previous study comparing abdominal sacrocolpopexy with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy revealed that women who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy were more likely to develop de novo stress urinary incontinence (n: 77; OR: 4.73; 95% CI: 1.56–14.34; p = 0.005). Another study found that pelvic organ prolapse repair using a transvaginal mesh was associated with higher levels of de novo stress urinary incontinence compared to robot‐assisted sacrocolpopexy (n: 76; OR: 6.74; 95% CI: 1.35–33.75; p = 0.02). A meta‐analysis of overweight or obesity was not possible due to the different assessment methods used in the studies. Conclusions This meta‐analysis revealed that occult incontinence, diabetes, and advanced pelvic organ prolapse before repair were associated with de novo stress urinary incontinence and these groups may therefore benefit from for anti‐incontinence procedures concomitant with pelvic organ prolapse repair.

De novo urethral hypermobility at 6 months after first delivery as a risk factor for stress urinary incontinence 12 years postpartum

A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors for Stress Urinary Incontinence 1 Year after Delivery in Multiparous Women

The impact of pregnancy and childbirth on stress urinary incontinence in women previously submitted to mid‐urethral sling: A systematic review and metanalysis

Can primigravid stress urinary incontinence be predicted by translabial urethral motion profile ultrasonography?

Occult Urinary Incontinence, Diabetes, Obesity, Prolapse Severity, and Type of Surgical Repair as Risk Factors for De Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women Undergoing Surgical Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Analysis of de novo stress urinany incontinence after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery

Incidence and Risk Factors of De Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence after Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A Nested Case-control Study.

Urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse symptoms 20-26 years after childbirth: A longitudinal cohort study

Postpartum urinary retention: what are the sequelae? A long-term study and review of the literature

Obstetric Perineal Tears, Birth Characteristics and the Association with Urinary Incontinence Among Primiparous Women 12 Months Postpartum: A Prospective Cohort Study

Characteristics Associated With Treatment Failure 1 Year After Midurethral Sling in Women With Mixed Urinary Incontinence

Transperineal Ultrasound Assessment of a Cystocele’s Impact on the Bladder Neck Mobility in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence

The Visualized Urethral Mobility Profile in Stress Urinary Incontinence Described by Four‐Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound

Epidemiological investigation and study on risk factors of stress urinary incontinence

Outcomes of Mid-Urethral Sling for Urodynamic Stress Incontinence Following Extensive Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

Postpartum stress urinary incontinence: lessons from animal models.

Postpartum stress urinary incontinence: a clinical study of 6,302 cases in Jiangsu Province.

Changing surgical trends for female stress urinary incontinence in England

A Motion-based Device Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Longitudinal Analysis at 18 and 24 Months

Pelvic floor‐related sexual functioning in the first 24 months postpartum: Findings of a large cross‐sectional study

Value of UVJ-M in the diagnosis of SUI in late pregnancy and postpartum