Analysis of de novo stress urinany incontinence after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery

SUN Xiuli,WANG Shiyan,SHEN Taifeng,YANG Xin,WANG Jianliu
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective The purpose of this study is to detect the risk factors for de novo SUI through retrospectively cases analysis. Methods Data of 140 patients with POP who underwent pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with Prolift system in Peking University People's hospital from January 2007 to February 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to SUI symptoms: group 1, POP concomitant with SUI: totally 29 cases, including 19 patients with type 1 SUI who underwent Kelly procedure and 10 patients with moderate or severe SUI underwent TVT-O surgery; group 2, De novo SUI, totally 27 cases; group 3, Control group, those who had no SUI pre- or post-operation. Results ① There were 20.71%(29/140)POP patients accompany with SUI, and the de novo SUI rate after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery was 24.32%(27/111). De novo SUI rate in subject SUI patients was 56.25%, which significantly higher than those had no subject SUI(14.88%)( P<0.05);② The Aa points of group 1 and group 2 were significantly higher than group 3(P<0.05), and Ba point of group 2 significantly higher than group 1 and 3(P<0.05).③ Qmax of group 1 was significantly higher than group 3(P<0.01), also was that in group 2 compared with group 3,but with no statistic significant(P>0.05). The MUPP in group 1 and 2 was lower than that in group 3(P<0.01).④ The relapse rate of SUI in Kelly group was much higher than that in TVT-O group (42.11% vs 20.00%, P<0.05). ⑤ Logstic analysis showed that preoperative subject SUI(P=0.00, OR 4.33~7.52),Aa≥2(P=0.01,OR 1.46~1.98) and MUPP≤38 cmH2O(P=0.00,OR 1.73~3.08) were risk factors for de novo SUI.Conclusions ① Preoperative subject SUI, Aa≥2 and MUPP≤38 cmH2O are risk factors for de novo SUI.② POP patients with objective SUI should underwent anti-SUI surgery accompany with pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.③ TVT-O is better than Kelly for SUI patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?