Abstract:Correlation does not imply causation and psychologists' causal inference training often focuses on the conclusion that therefore experiments are needed—without much consideration for the causal inference frameworks used elsewhere. This leaves researchers ill‐equipped to solve inferential problems that they encounter in their work, leading to mistaken conclusions and incoherent statistical analyses. For a more systematic approach to causal inference, this article provides brief introductions to the potential outcomes framework—the "lingua franca" of causal inference—and to directed acyclic graphs, a graphical notation that makes it easier to systematically reason about complex causal situations. I then discuss two issues that may be of interest to researchers in social and personality psychology who think that formalized causal inference is of little relevance to their work. First, posttreatment bias: In various common scenarios (noncompliance, mediation analysis, missing data), researchers may analyze data from experimental studies in a manner that results in internally invalid conclusions, despite randomization. Second, tests of incremental validity: Routine practices in personality psychology suggest that they may be conducted for at least two different reasons (to demonstrate the non‐redundancy of new scales, to support causal conclusions) without being particularly suited for either purpose. Taking causal inference seriously is challenging; it reveals assumptions that may make many uncomfortable. However, ultimately it is a necessary step to ensure the validity of psychological research.

Teaching statistical inference for causal effects in experiments and observational studies

Basic concepts of statistical inference for causal effects in experiments and observational studies

Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: an Introduction

Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences

Statistical Inference For Causal Effects, With Emphasis On Applications In Epidemiology And Medical Statistics

2 statistical inference for causal effects, with emphasis on applications in epidemiology and medical statistics

Causal inference

24 Statistical Inference for Causal Effects, with Emphasis on Applications in Psychometrics and Education

Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects

Practical implications of modes of statistical inference for causal effects and the critical role of the assignment mechanism

Formal mode of statistical inference for causal effects

Statistics and Causal Inference

Introduction to Causal Inference for Psychologists: Testable and Non-Testable Causal and Statistical Assumptions

Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: the Role of Randomization

What Would It Take to Change an Inference? Using Rubin’s Causal Model to Interpret the Robustness of Causal Inferences

For Objective Causal Inference, Design Trumps Analysis

Causal Inference in the Social Sciences

Causal inference for psychologists who think that causal inference is not for them

Statistical Approaches for Causal Inference