Abstract:Abstract Background The United Kingdom health system is challenged with retaining doctors entering specialty training directly after their second foundation year. Improving doctors’ training experience during the foundation programme may aid such retention. The Longitudinal Integrated Foundation Training (LIFT) pilot scheme aimed to provide a programme that improves the quality of their foundation training experience, advance patient-centred care and provide doctors with more experience in the primary care settings. Methods During this pilot study, three methods were employed to evaluate and compare doctors’ experiences across their 2-year foundation training programme: Horus ePortfolio assessment of six domains for good medical practice analysed using a T-test, online survey assessments analysed using a 2-tailed chi-square test, and focus group feedback sessions with thematic analysis. Results Doctors completing LIFT (n = 47) scored a higher but non-significant mean score on all six domains for good medical practice versus doctors completing traditional foundation training (n = 94). By the end of foundation training, 100% of LIFT doctors rated their understanding of how primary and secondary care work together as high versus 78.7% of traditional doctors (p < 0.05). Improvements in wellbeing were observed among LIFT doctors, along with a reduction in the proportion of doctors considering leaving medical training. A significantly greater number of LIFT doctors versus traditional doctors rated their compassion for patients as high (100% versus 86.8%; p < 0.05), intended to become general practitioners (23.1% versus 13.5%; p < 0.05) and rated the extent to which they felt well informed and able to consider a general practice career rather than a hospital career as high (91.7% versus 72.3%, respectively; p < 0.05). Some LIFT doctors felt they had reduced exposure to secondary care, received less on-call experience and considered working a half-day to be problematic; challenges ameliorated by the end of the 2-year foundation programme. Conclusion The LIFT programme enhanced the quality of foundation training and improved doctors’ experiences and competencies, generating valuable insights for the future of education and healthcare delivery. Applying the principles of LIFT to foundation training helps doctors to be more compassionate and patient-centred, leading to enhanced individualised patient care.

Specialised foundation programme allocation: making research everyone's business

Making research everybody's business-Innovation to introduce Foundation doctors to research

Changes to academic foundation jobs spark concern

A Foundation Programme educational placement in peri-operative medicine for older people: mixed methods evaluation

Changes to the UK foundation programme add further challenges for doctors pursuing clinical academic careers

Foundation job allocation in the UK

The impact of Longitudinal Integrated Foundation Training: preliminary experiences in the United Kingdom

Relationship between sociodemographic factors and selection into UK postgraduate medical training programmes: a national cohort study

Concerns about preference informed allocation in the UK foundation programme

New allocation system for foundation training leaves doctors demoralised before they've even started work

Protocol for the SELECT study: a sequential mixed methods study of the selection of UK medical students into clinical academic training

Building a safer foundation: the Lessons Learnt patient safety training programme

Responsibility with a Safety Net: Exploring the Medical Student to Junior Doctor Transition During COVID-19

Supporting healthcare professionals from ethnic minority backgrounds to 'Step Into' a clinical academic career

Extended training to prepare GPs for future workforce needs: a qualitative investigation of a 1-year fellowship in urgent care

Foundation rotations in medical training: is it love at first sight?

Building a Physician-Scientist Pathway for Underrepresented Medical Students Through a Summer Research Experience

'It's surprising how differently they treat you': a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors

UK OMF surgeons support changes to current specialty recruitment process which could include 'Walport' style local selection and national benchmarking

Health and medical research funding agencies’ promotion of public engagement within research: a qualitative interview study exploring the United Kingdom context

The Impact of Postgraduate Leadership Development Fellowships for Doctors-in-Training: Reflections from a Fellow's Experience and a Narrative Literature Review