Force Field Benchmark of Amino Acids. 3. Hydration with Scaled Lennard-Jones Interactions

Yejie Qiu,Wenjie Shan,Haiyang Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00339
IF: 6.162
2021-06-29
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Abstract:Classical protein force fields were reported with too weak protein–water interactions relative to protein–protein interactions, leading to more compact structures and artificial protein aggregation. Here we investigated the impacts of scaled Lennard-Jones (LJ) interactions on the hydration of amino acids and the simulation of folded and intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). The obtained optimal scaling parameters reproduce accurately hydration free energies of neutral amino acid side chain analogues and do not affect the compactness and structural stability of folded proteins significantly. The scaling leads to less compact IDPs and varies from case to case. Strengthening the interactions between protein and water oxygen or hydrogen atoms by increasing the interacting LJ well depth (ε) appears more effective than weakening protein–protein interactions by reducing the interacting dispersion coefficients (<i>C</i><sub>6</sub>). We demonstrate that weakening water–water interactions is a solution as well to obtaining more favorable protein–water interactions in an indirect way, although modern force fields like Amber ff19SB and a99SB-<i>disp</i> tend to use water models with strong water–water interactions. This is likely a compromise between strong protein–protein interactions and strong water–water interactions. Independent optimization of protein force fields and water models is therefore needed to make both interactions more close to reality, leading to good accuracy without bias or scaling.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00339?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00339</a>.Scaling parameters tested for the four strategies (Table S1), system setup for protein simulation (Table S2), LJ parameters for <a class="internalNav" href="#fig3">Figure </a><a class="internalNav" href="#fig3">3</a>b plotting (Table S3), LJ parameters for water oxygen and intermolecular energies (<i>E</i><sub>i</sub>) of water molecules (Table S4), <i>E</i><sub>i</sub> as a function of simulation time for TIP3P and TIPS3P (Figure S1), the radius of gyration (<i>R</i><sub>g</sub>) as a function of simulation time for folded proteins (Figure S2), simulated <i>R</i><sub>g</sub> with error estimates by block averaging (Figure S3), RMSD of protein backbone from crystal structure (Figure S4), and <i>R</i><sub>g</sub> vs simulation time for the IDPs (Figure S5) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00339/suppl_file/ci1c00339_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)Scaled nonbonded parameters and simulation MDP files (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00339/suppl_file/ci1c00339_si_002.zip">ZIP</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, multidisciplinary, medicinal,computer science, interdisciplinary applications, information systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?