Early Myeloid Lineage Choice is Not Initiated by Random PU.1 to GATA1 Protein Ratios
Philipp S. Hoppe,Michael Schwarzfischer,Dirk Loeffler,Konstantinos D. Kokkaliaris,Oliver Hilsenbeck,Nadine Moritz,Max Endele,Adam Filipczyk,Adriana Gambardella,Nouraiz Ahmed,Martin Etzrodt,Daniel L. Coutu,Michael A. Rieger,Carsten Marr,Michael K. Strasser,Bernhard Schauberger,Ingo Burtscher,Olga Ermakova,Antje Bürger,Heiko Lickert,Claus Nerlov,Fabian J. Theis,Timm Schroeder
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18320
IF: 64.8
2016-01-01
Nature
Abstract:Live imaging and single-cell analyses are used to show that decision-making by differentiating haematopoietic stem cells between the megakaryocytic–erythroid and granulocytic–monocytic lineages is not initiated by stochastic switching between the lineage-specific transcription factors PU.1 and GATA1, which challenges the previous model of early myeloid lineage choice. How lineage-inducing transcription factors promote cell fate in the haematopoietic lineage is debated. Population level analyses have uncovered the existence of positive feedback and mutual inhibition, which suggested that lineage choice is driven stochastically by fluctuating antagonistic transcription factors. Timm Schroeder and colleagues use live imaging and single-cell analyses to demonstrate that the decision made by haematopoietic stem cells to differentiate along the megakaryocytic–erythroid or granulocytic–monocytic lineage does not depend on such stochastic switching between lineage-specific transcription factors PU.1 and GATA1, a conclusion that challenges the previous model of early myeloid lineage choice. The mechanisms underlying haematopoietic lineage decisions remain disputed. Lineage-affiliated transcription factors1,2 with the capacity for lineage reprogramming3, positive auto-regulation4,5 and mutual inhibition6,7 have been described as being expressed in uncommitted cell populations8. This led to the assumption that lineage choice is cell-intrinsically initiated and determined by stochastic switches of randomly fluctuating cross-antagonistic transcription factors3. However, this hypothesis was developed on the basis of RNA expression data from snapshot and/or population-averaged analyses9,10,11,12. Alternative models of lineage choice therefore cannot be excluded. Here we use novel reporter mouse lines and live imaging for continuous single-cell long-term quantification of the transcription factors GATA1 and PU.1 (also known as SPI1). We analyse individual haematopoietic stem cells throughout differentiation into megakaryocytic–erythroid and granulocytic–monocytic lineages. The observed expression dynamics are incompatible with the assumption that stochastic switching between PU.1 and GATA1 precedes and initiates megakaryocytic–erythroid versus granulocytic–monocytic lineage decision-making. Rather, our findings suggest that these transcription factors are only executing and reinforcing lineage choice once made. These results challenge the current prevailing model of early myeloid lineage choice.