Abstract:The well-documented rating inflation of incentivized reviews (IRs) can mislead consumers into choosing a product that they would otherwise not buy. To protect consumers from this undesirable influence, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission recommends that reviewers conspicuously disclose any material connection they may have with sellers. In theory, such disclosures safeguard consumers by motivating reviewers to be truthful and inducing consumers to discount inflated IR ratings. Our research finds, however, that IR disclosure accomplishes neither. Specifically, our empirical analysis of consumer reviews on Amazon reveals that, even with disclosure, (1) rating inflation of IRs remains, and (2) this inflation boosts sales at consumers’ expense. Finally, we propose an alternative approach to eliminate rating inflation of IRs and empirically demonstrate its effectiveness. These findings have important implications for consumers, firms, and ongoing policy discussions around IRs. This paper was accepted by Duncan Simester, marketing. Funding: S. Park gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Darla Moore School of Business Research Grant Program at the University of South Carolina. W. Shin gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Brian R. Gamache Endowed Professorship at the University of Florida. J. Xie gratefully acknowledges financial support from the JCPenney Endowed Professorship at the University of Florida. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00930 .

Estimating the Distaste for Price Gouging with Incentivized Consumer Reports

Price Gouging or Market Forces? Fairness Perceptions of Price Hikes in the Pandemic

Why High Incentives Cause Repugnance: A Framed Field Experiment

Contamination and Incomplete Information:: Bounding Implicit Prices using High-Profile Leaks

Choosing to Pay More for Electricity: An Experiment on the Level of Residential Consumer Cooperation

So, It's Pricier Than Before, but Why? Price Increase Justifications Influence Risky Decision Making and Emotional Response

Disclosure in Incentivized Reviews

Testing the effectiveness of lottery incentives in online experiments

Price Setting in Chile: Micro Evidence from Consumer On-Line Prices During the Social Outbreak and Covid-19

Personalized information and willingness to pay for non-financial risk prevention: An experiment

Consumer Behavior under Benevolent Price Discrimination

The social value of overreaction to information

The Effects of Gasoline Price Regulations: Experimental Evidence

Disclosure in Incentivized Reviews: Does It Protect Consumers?

Misreporting As Strategic Experimentation: Theory and Evidence

Demand Response in the Smart Grid: the Impact of Consumers Temporal Preferences

Panics and Prices

Bearing the burden — Implications of tax reporting institutions on evasion and incidence

What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics

Take it or Leave it: Running a Survey when Privacy Comes at a Cost

Anticipation, Tax Avoidance, and the Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand