Abstract:Objectives: Nanocomposite ceramics have been widely used in clinical practice; however, a standard, recommended bonding protocol has not been determined yet. The present study aimed to evaluate application of tribochemical silica coating or multipurpose products on bonding performance of a CAD/CAM resin-based material (known as nanocomposite ceramic). Materials and methods: Nanocomposite ceramic specimens were fabricated and assigned into 11 groups to build bonded specimens (n = 15) according to surface treatments (none; air particle abrasion with 50-μm alumina followed by application of a silane coupling agent or a universal adhesive; tribochemical silica coating followed by application of a silane coupling agent or a universal adhesive) and resin luting cements (conventional resin cement, RelyX Veneer; self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem) used. Micro-shear bond strength (μ-SBS) was measured after 24-h water storage or ageing with 10,000 thermocycles plus additional 90-d water storage. Surface roughness after alumina air abrasion and tribochemical silica coating were determined using a profilometer. Surface morphology and element variation were observed by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM)/energy dispersion spectrum (EDS). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to characterize nanocomposite ceramic powders conditioned with silane coupling agent or the universal adhesive used in the μ-SBS test. The nanocomposite ceramic plates received alumina air abrasion, tribochemical silica coating, or without, were determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD). Results: Nanocomposite ceramic treated with alumina air abrasion achieved the highest surface roughness, followed by those treated with tribochemical silica coating. Newly formed Si-O-Si bonds on the nanocomposite ceramic surface were detected by XPS after treatment with silane coupling agent or universal adhesive, and a Zr-O-P bond was detected after treating with universal adhesive. μ-SBS was significantly affected by bond strategies and ageing. Ageing by thermocycling and water storage significantly decreased μ-SBS. μ-SBS values derived by use of a universal adhesive or self-adhesive resin cement alone were no lower than the values derived by use of a silane coupling agent alone. Pre-silanization further enhanced the bonding improvement of universal adhesive or self-adhesive resin cement. However, tribochemical silica coating failed to provide higher μ-SBS compared with alumina air abrasion. XRD detected no monoclinic zirconia phase after alumina air abrasion or tribochemical silica coating, suggesting that these two roughening methods did not lead to phase transformation of zirconia fillers. Conclusions: Combination of presilanization and universal adhesives improve resin bonding of nanocomposite ceramics. Tribochemical silica coating is not superior to alumina air abrasion for pretreated nanocomposite ceramics.

Is additional silane application necessary for a new silane‐containing universal adhesive to bond to glass ceramics?

Different adhesive approaches for the bonding of a new universal resin cement to a disilicate glass‐ceramic

Silane reactivity and resin bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic surfaces

Influence of Varied Silane Commercial Brands and Adhesive Application on Bond Strength and Stability to Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic

Increasing Acid Concentration, Time and Using a Two-Part Silane Potentiates Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate–Reinforced Glass Ceramic to Resin Composite: An Exploratory Laboratory Study

Effect of Silane Coupling Agent on Composite-Composite Bond Strength: an in Vitro Study

Optimal Hydrofluoric Acid Etching Duration and Impact of Silane/Adhesive on Profilometric Properties and Bonding to Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramics

Effects of Surface Treatment Procedures on Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic.

Does the application of an adhesive layer improve the bond strength of etched and silanized glass-ceramics to resin-based materials? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bond Strength to Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic after Different Surface Cleaning Approaches

Does the surface conditioning of glass and hybrid ceramics with self-etching silane present a bond strength similar to that of conventional bonding? Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies

[Bond Durability of Self-Adhesive Resin Cement to Glass Ceramic].

Effect of siloxane quantity and ph of silane coupling agents and contact angle of resin bonding agent on bond durability of resin cements to machinable ceramic.

Effect of Silane-Containing Adhesives on Repair Bond Strength between Fresh and Aged Composite Materials—A Pilot Study

The effect of adhesive surface with porcelain sintering and two silane coupling agents on the adhesive properties of zirconia

Different Etching Times of a One-step Ceramic Primer: Effect on the Resin Bond Strength Durability to a CAD/CAM Lithium-Disilicate Glass-Ceramic

Chemical adhesion rather than mechanical retention enhances resin bond durability of a dental glass-ceramic with leucite crystallites

Effect of tribochemical silica coating or multipurpose products on bonding performance of a CAD/CAM resin-based material

Adhesion to lithium disilicate glass-ceramics after aging: Resin viscosity and ceramic surface treatment effects

Chemical surface modification of lithium disilicate needles of a silica-based ceramic after HF-etching and ultrasonic bath cleaning: impact on the chemical bonding with silane

Microshear bond strength of resin bonding systems to machinable ceramic with different surface treatments.