Abstract:Introduction: Established in 2009, the Department of Defense (DoD) Peer-Reviewed Orthopaedic Research Program (PRORP) is an annual funding program for orthopaedic research that seeks to develop evidence for new clinical practice guidelines, procedures, technologies, and drugs. The aim was to help reduce the burden of injury for wounded Service members, Veterans, and civilians and to increase return-to-duty and return-to-work rates. Relative to its burden of disease, musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) are one of the most disproportionately underfunded conditions. The focus of the PRORP includes a broad spectrum of MSKI in areas related to unique aspect of combat- and some noncombat-related injuries. The PRORP may serve as an important avenue of research for nonmilitary communities by offering areas of shared interests for the advancement of military and civilian patient cohort MSKI care. The purpose of this study was to provide a descriptive analysis of the DoD PRORP, which is an underrecognized but high value source of research funding for a broad spectrum of both combat- and noncombat-related MSKIs. Methods: The complete PRORP Funding Portfolio for FY2009-FY2017 was obtained from the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP), which includes 255 awarded grants. Information pulled from the CDMRP included awardee descriptors (sex, education level, affiliated institution type, research specialty, and previous award winner [yes/no]) and grant award descriptors (grant amount, year, primary and secondary awarded topics, research type awarded, and mechanism of award). Distribution statistics were broken down by principal investigator specialty, sex, degree, organization type, research type, mechanism, and research topics. Distribution and statistical analysis was applied using R software version 3.6.3. Results: From FY2009 to 2017, $285 million was allocated for 255 PRORP-funded research studies. The seven major orthopaedic subspecialties (foot and ankle, hand, musculoskeletal oncology, pediatrics, spine, sports medicine, and trauma) were represented. Trauma and hand subspecialists received the largest amount of funding, approximately $28 (9.6%) and $22 million (7.1%), respectively. However, only 22 (8.6%) and 26 (10.2%) of the primary investigators were trauma and hand subspecialists, respectively. The primary research categories were diverse with the top five funded PRORP topics being rehabilitation ($53 million), consortia ($39 million), surgery ($37 million), device development ($30 million), and pharmacology ($10 million). Discussion: The CDMRP funding represents an excellent resource for orthopaedic medical research support that includes trauma and nontrauma orthopaedic conditions. This study serves to promote and communicate the missions of the PRORP both within and beyond the DoD to raise awareness and expand access of available funding for orthopaedic focused research. Significance/clinical relevance: A likelihood exists that this project will provide sustained and powerful influence on future research by promoting awareness of orthopaedic funding sources. Level of evidence: Level III.

Research prioritization in paediatric orthopaedics and the impact on funding

Orthopedic Research Funding: Assessing the Relationship between Investments and Breakthroughs.

An In-Depth Analysis of Public and Private Research Funding in Orthopaedic Surgery from 2015 to 2021

Institutional Priority-Setting for Novel Drugs and Therapeutics: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Priorities for paediatric critical care research: a modified Delphi study by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Paediatric Study Group

UK research priority setting for childhood neurological conditions

Refocusing research: A mixed methods study to evaluate utilisation of the top 10 priorities for occupational therapy research in the United Kingdom

Research Trends in Presurgical Infant Orthopaedic Treatment in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Bibliometric Analysis of 100 Most-Cited Articles

Research priorities of members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee

JAMES LIND ALLIANCE FIRST TIME SOFT TISSUE KNEE INJURIES PRIORITY SETTING PARTNERSHIP: TOP TEN RESEARCH PRIORITIES

Peer review practices in academic medicine: how the example of orthopaedic surgery may help shift the paradigm?

Priority-setting for hospital funding of high-cost innovative drugs and therapeutics: A qualitative institutional case study

Research priorities for childhood chronic conditions: a workshop report

Podium to Publication: An Analysis of Papers Presented at the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons (BAPS) Congress (2009-19)

Reducing Challenges in Orthopedic Oncology Research

Priority Setting for Multicenter Research Among Adults with Cerebral Palsy: A Qualitative Study

How Does Orthopaedic Research Affect Patient Care?

Health System Research Priorities for Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs

The Current State of International Academic Partnerships in Orthopaedic Surgery Between High-Income and Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Utilization of the Department of Defense Peer-Reviewed Orthopaedic Research Program (PRORP): Combating Musculoskeletal Disease With PRORP

Research Priorities for Pediatric Intensive Care Nutrition Within the United Kingdom: A National Institute of Health Research James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership