[Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for abdominal surgery in a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]

Noriyuki Shintani,Tadahiko Ishiyama,Kazuhiro Shibuya,Manabu Ichikawa,Iwao Okawa,Takashi Matsukawa
Abstract:A 69-year-old man (150 cm, 57 kg)who had been diagnosed as having COPD, was admitted to our hospital because of abdominal pain and drowsiness. He was diagnosed as CO2 narcosis and perforation of appendix. When he recovered from CO2 narcosis, he was scheduled for elective ilectomy. Because his pulmonary function was impaired, combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was selected. With the patient in the right lateral position, an epidural catheter was inserted at T12-L1 interspace, and spinal anesthesia was performed at L3-4 interspace with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine 4 ml. When the patient was positioned laterally, SpO2 decreased from 82% to 77%. After completion of injection, the patient was returned to the supine position, and SpO2 immediately recovered. Spinal block level was not satisfactory, and fentanyl 0.1 mg and 2% mepivacaine 4 ml were administered through epidural catheter to achieve a T4 level of block. Because severe intraperitoneal inflammation was observed, ilectomy was changed to drainage of intra-abdominal abscess. The patient did not complain of dyspnea, pain, or nausea, intraoperatively. SpO2 was 85-93% with O2 inhalation at 1l x min(-1) during the operation. Post-operative course was uneventful. Although lateral position is popular in performing epidural and spinal anesthesia, sitting position could be suitable for this patient. Decrease in SpO2 may have occurred due to ventilation-perfusion mismatch. Since combined spinal and epidural anesthesia can preserve spontaneous respiration and it is possible to titrate anesthetic level, it would be preferable for abdominal surgery in patients with COPD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?