Abstract:Abstract Background Current naming tests such as the Boston Naming Test (BNT) and the Multilingual Naming Test have demonstrated significant clinical utility in detecting naming deficits in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), assisting with differential diagnosis among neurodegenerative disorders, and measuring disease progression in AD. However, the tests are time‐consuming due to their large number of items, and pen‐and‐paper administration. A computerized, adaptive naming test could increase the accuracy and speed of assessment, enhance usability, and minimize cross‐cultural testing disparities. Method Current naming tests that produce accurate results over a range of naming abilities are lengthy, because they must both include items that densely cover the large range of potential abilities. In contrast, an adaptive test can be more efficient, by quickly zeroing in on a narrow range and then concentrating test questions only in the vicinity of the participant’s underlying ability. This maximizes efficiency in terms of information obtained per item, by tailoring the test to avoid items that would, based on previous responses, be either too easy or too difficult for the current participant. Result We show via a series of probabilistic simulations that the precision of item property estimates would limit effectiveness of adaptive strategies previously attempted (Fergadiotis et al., 2015). In fact, we find that the mismatch between the true properties of items and existing estimates, due to the broad confidence regions of these estimates (Embretson & Reise, 2000) considerably reduces achievable accuracy. We are therefore in the process of delineating item properties with considerably higher fidelity than those currently available in order to achieve the efficiency improvement that adaptive testing can in principle deliver, analyzing the results of individual item responses from over a 1000 BNT administrations from participants distributed across a range of ability levels. We will test the ability of adaptively‐chosen 12‐item subsets of the BNT to estimate the full scores from our clinics via simulation and implement a new ipad‐based adaptive tool, prospectively testing its accuracy in predicting the BNT score and its ability to identify MCI and AD. Conclusion The development of a computerized, adaptive, naming test may allow considerable time savings while maintaining accuracy.

Naming test of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery: convergent and discriminant validity

Validity of the Verbal Naming Test and Boston Naming Test in a sample of older Veterans

Assessing the Discriminant Ability, Reliability, and Comparability of Multiple Short Forms of the Boston Naming Test in an Alzheimer's Disease Center Cohort

Boston Naming Test in Chinese Elderly, Patient with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Dementia

A Color-Picture Version of Boston Naming Test Outperformed the Black-and-White Version in Discriminating Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer's Disease

A-157 Lexical-Semantic Analysis of Verbal Naming Test Performance in Older Adult Veterans

Subclinical naming errors in mild cognitive impairment

Item-Level Scores on the Boston Naming Test as an Independent Predictor of Perirhinal Volume in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment

Developing a brief, accurate and adaptive version of the Boston Naming Test based on high‐fidelity estimates of item properties

Item response theory for the color-picture version of Boston naming test in a Chinese sample with neurodegenerative diseases

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of neuropsychological test battery

Recognition Subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: Preliminary Validation

Validation of the Thai version of the short Boston Naming Test (T-BNT) in patients with Alzheimer's dementia and mild cognitive impairment: clinical and biomarker correlates.

Auditory naming is impaired in posterior cortical atrophy and early-onset Alzheimer's disease

Convergent Validity of Experimental Cognitive Tests in a Large Community Sample

Cross-cultural Diagnostic Validity of the Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) in a Sample of Older Adults

The multilingual naming test in Alzheimer's disease: clues to the origin of naming impairments

A verb-naming test accurately detects cognitive changes in ALS

Diagnostic Value of Time-Constrained Naming Test in Mild Cognitive Impairment

A - 32 Impact of Demographic Factors in African American (AA) Older Adults in Relation to Confrontational Naming Deficits on an Object Naming Task.

Validity of Computer Based Administration of Cognitive Assessments compared to Traditional Paper-based Administration